Safe Haven | Preservation of Capital
"Everything should be made as simple as
possible, but not simpler." - Albert Einstein
HOME ARCHIVES FORUMS SEARCH SITE MAP ABOUT US

<<- Previous Message Next Message ->>
<- Previous In Thread
From:craig tindale
Received:10/23/2009 12:50 AM
Subject:Re:Who is BO''s Daddy?

They are way to big , cut them up into pieces, to big to fail is frankly to big altogether. They do not contribute to the wealth of society they harvest wealth from other sectors, frankly they are an overhead (a necessary one though). Its my view that the structure of banking is changing and the crisis was a symptom of these changes , the creative destruction (if given its head) would have  made most of them obsolete, the market would have replaced them fairly quickly, investment banking is 7 parts parasitic 2parts useful 1 part criminal, this reflects that the sector has over grown its useful segment and size. The truth is they are not competitive now without government bail out, off balance sheet shenanigans, 3rd tier assets and mark to fantasy the losses have been nationalized leaving the profits private. Marx was right about one thing (and wrong about a lot) the cavaliers of credit are the major weakness in capitalism, Universal banking is like any monopoly bad for everyone, oh yeah and they cant compete? they aren't now they are drunken sailors and the casino table and even if Obama doesnt do it the next one or the one after will, most bankers are myopic with little understanding of economies, wealth, productivity or much else

On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:47 AM, peter richardson <> wrote:
What kind of crap is this? Volcker has long been against universal banking.
The world has had universal banking for over 1,000 years dating back at
least to the heyday of Venice. Stripping out investment banking from US
banks will over time reduce their profitability unless they raise fees very
substantially. It will leave US banks at a sizable competitive disadvantage
to other major banks around the globe, all of which have investment and
merchant banking operations. And, Volcker is full of crap on this himself.
Glass - Steagall did not prevent the need to bail out big banks over 1980 - 82,
and of the 90 plus banks that have gone down this year in the US almost
none had investment bank arms save for Wachovia. Volcker's little
recipe did not save the S&Ls in the early 1990s either, and I could go on.
 
Obama just gave the big boys quite a haircut as well and the Gov has been
roughing them up via TARP for months. Bonus comp. plans will be controlled
and regulators will be empowered to snoop through everyone's undies at
banks for years to come.
 
Study up, Maxman...
 
PR
 
 

You are subscribed to the SafeHaven Longwaves Forum To Unsubscribe, send a blank email to with the word Unsubscribe in the subject line.

 

<<- Previous Message Next Message ->>
<- Previous In Thread

 

« Opinions expressed at SafeHaven Forums are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven, its management, or the forum moderators. »

 
 
Top of Page
Read ourDISCLAIMER
HOME | ARCHIVES | FORUMS | SEARCH | SITE MAP
ABOUT US | LINKS | CONTACT US
Copyright © 2000-2010 - SAFEHAVEN.com
Server Admin by DIGITAL ADMIN
SafeHaven Web Site FEEDS
Get RSS Feeds