| From: | "Jonathan Keough" |
| Received: | 08/02/2004 06:20 PM |
| Subject: | Re: Who is al Qaeda rooting for? |
ΓΏ
No Bill, not governments. Their
leaders are often easily
bribed or are other wise interested in
payola. That is how
former Presidents here and other world
leaders become
billionaires. For example
this man ....Karimov..... the boiler
... is
very happy with the
administration and its money support.
See: Look at all the happy faces
here.
[Senior US Officials Cozy up to Dictator Who Boils
People Alive:
According to a
forensic report commissioned by the British
embassy, in August
two prisoners were even boiled to death.]
Rather .. the people .. the people of
different countries are
uniting ... did they not do a survey in
Canada? Or marches
in Europe? And does not the current
President find loud crowds
at most foreign places he goes? Do
not these large often massive
crowds show their view?
Lately even the US reporters are mentioning
this "world unity"
when they talk about how the current
President is greeted
by the people of so many places.
[Actually not greeted
since they there are massive no go zones
now needed
for visits].
----- Original Message -----
Not quite, Jonathan. The
British (government anyway) and some island called Pango-pongo or something
like that are still on our side.
But I though the current administration
has pretty much united the
world?
----- Original Message -----
From today's Progress
Report:
An article in last week's New Yorker dealing with
the Madrid bombings directly contradicts recent unsubstantiated statements
by Bush administration
officials and media pundits
that terrorists are rooting for John Kerry to win the White House in 2004.
The New Yorker reports a terrorist group claiming affiliation with al
Qaeda, the Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades, has publicly stated its desire for
President Bush to remain in office. In a message sent to a London
newspaper just days after the Madrid bombings, the authors write, "We are
very keen that Bush does not lose the upcoming elections." Bush's "idiocy
and religious fanaticism" are useful, the authors contend, "for th ey stir
the Islamic world to action." <snip>
|