No Bill, not governments.  Their leaders are often easily

bribed or are other wise interested in payola.  That is how

former Presidents here and other world leaders become

billionaires.   For example this man ....Karimov..... the boiler

 ... is very happy with the administration and its money support.

See: Look at all the happy faces here.

 

[Senior US Officials Cozy up to Dictator Who Boils People Alive:

http://www.thememoryhole.org/pol/us-and-uz.htm

According to a forensic report commissioned by the British

embassy, in August two prisoners were even boiled to death.]

 

Rather .. the people .. the people of different countries are

uniting ... did they not do a survey in Canada?  Or marches

in Europe?  And does not the current President find loud crowds

at most foreign places he goes?  Do not these large often massive

crowds show their view? 

 

Lately even the US reporters are mentioning this "world unity"

when they talk about how the current President is greeted

by the people of so many places.  [Actually not greeted

since they there are massive no go zones now needed

for visits].

----- Original Message -----

Not quite, Jonathan.  The British (government anyway) and some island called Pango-pongo or something like that are still on our side.

But I though the current administration has pretty much united the

world?

----- Original Message -----

From today's Progress Report:

 

An article in last week's New Yorker dealing with the Madrid bombings directly contradicts recent unsubstantiated statements by Bush administration officials and media pundits that terrorists are rooting for John Kerry to win the White House in 2004. The New Yorker reports a terrorist group claiming affiliation with al Qaeda, the Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades, has publicly stated its desire for President Bush to remain in office. In a message sent to a London newspaper just days after the Madrid bombings, the authors write, "We are very keen that Bush does not lose the upcoming elections." Bush's "idiocy and religious fanaticism" are useful, the authors contend, "for th ey stir the Islamic world to action." <snip>