It looks like someone linked you here to our printer friendly page. Please make sure you go Back to Safehaven.com for more great articles just like this one!
Big Brother in Action: EU Wants Power to Sack Journalists; Prime Minister Rajoy Threatens Newspapers Following Corruption Articles
"Big Brother" in Action
In case you have not already realized it, 1984 has come and gone politically. All that remains is how fast we march down the path of "thought suppression". Here are a couple of articles that will make my point.
The Telegraph reports EU wants power to sack journalists
A European Union report has urged tight press regulation and demanded that Brussels officials are given control of national media supervisors with new powers to enforce fines or the sacking of journalists.
The "high level" recommendations that will be used to draft future EU legislation also attack David Cameron for failing to automatically implement proposals by the Lord Justice Leveson inquiry for a state regulation of British press.
A "high level" EU panel, that includes Latvia's former president and a former German justice minister, was ordered by Neelie Kroes, European Commission vice-president, last year to report on "media freedom and pluralism". It has concluded that it is time to introduce new rules to rein in the press.
"All EU countries should have independent media councils," the report concluded.
"Media councils should have real enforcement powers, such as the imposition of fines, orders for printed or broadcast apologies, or removal of journalistic status."
"The national media councils should follow a set of European-wide standards and be monitored by the Commission to ensure that they comply with European values," the report said.
Nigel Farage, the leader of Ukip, compared the proposals to "Orwell's 1984". "This is a flagrant attack on press freedom. To hear that unelected bureaucrats in Brussels want the power to fine and suspend journalists is just outrageous," he said.
Reflections on "European Values" and a UK Referendum
Financial transactions taxes and agricultural crop subsidies are bad enough. This proposal for "thought police" should scare everyone.
What the hell are "European values"?
Even if there was such a thing, it is absurd and scary to cram them down everyone's throat. If ever there was any justification for Cameron to tell the EU to "go to hell" this is surely it.
Conservatives in UK need to demand an in-or-out referendum now.
Prime Minister Rajoy Threatens Newspapers Following Corruption Article
Want to report on government corruption? Better think twice. "Big Brother" is always watching out (for himself).
Please consider the saga of bribes paybacks and corruption in Spain where the former treasurer of the People's Party, Luis Bárcenas, had amassed up to €22 million ($30 million) from dubious sources, and hid them in Switzerland. Regardless of how Bárcenas got the money, he handed party officials envelopes filled with banknotes worth between €5,000 and 15,000 every month.
Rajoy, opposition leader and head of the PP at the time of transgressions, protected Bárcenas. Now Rajoy wants the disclosures to stop.
How Powerful People React in Tight Spots
Der Spiegel reports Envelopes of Cash: Corruption Charges Put Madrid on Defensive.
The powerful reacted the way powerful people react when they are in a tight spot. Former Prime Minister José María Aznar instructed his attorneys to sue the newspaper El País.
Current Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, a conservative like Aznar, threatened to sue anyone who leveled accusations at his People's Party (PP).
Bárcenas denies all accusations. And if he is sent to prison, he has threatened that an "atom bomb" will explode.
Reflections on the "Atom Bomb" Threat
It's rather curious how Bárcenas can deny all accusations while simultaneously threatening to set off a political "atom bomb". If everyone is innocent, then it is logically impossible for there to be a political bomb to explode.
In an attempt to sweep this under the rug, Prime minister Rajoy is now threatening newspapers or anyone else throwing charges against the PP.
However, the more they try and sweep under the rug, the bigger and faster the rug needs to grow.
If you have not yet read Nineteen Eighty-Four, please do so because you are living it. Here is a synopsis from Wikipedia.
Nineteen Eighty-Four is a novel by George Orwell published in 1949. It is a dystopian and satirical novel set in Oceania, where society is tyrannized by The Party and its totalitarian ideology. The Oceanian province of Airstrip One is a world of perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance, and public mind control, dictated by a political system euphemistically named English Socialism (Ingsoc) under the control of a privileged Inner Party elite that persecutes all individualism and independent thinking as thoughtcrimes. Their tyranny is headed by Big Brother, the quasi-divine Party leader who enjoys an intense cult of personality, but who may not even exist. Big Brother and the Party justify their rule in the name of a supposed greater good. The protagonist of the novel, Winston Smith, is a member of the Outer Party who works for the Ministry of Truth (Minitrue), which is responsible for propaganda and historical revisionism. His job is to re-write past newspaper articles so that the historical record always supports the current party line. Smith is a diligent and skillful worker, but he secretly hates the Party and dreams of rebellion against Big Brother.
As literary political fiction and as dystopian science-fiction, Nineteen Eighty-Four is a classic novel in content, plot, and style. Many of its terms and concepts, such as Big Brother, doublethink, thoughtcrime, Newspeak, and memory hole, have entered everyday use since its publication in 1949. Moreover, Nineteen Eighty-Four popularised the adjective Orwellian, which describes official deception, secret surveillance, and manipulation of the past by a totalitarian or authoritarian state. In 2005 the novel was chosen by TIME magazine as one of the 100 best English-language novels from 1923 to 2005. It was awarded a place on both lists of Modern Library 100 Best Novels, reaching number 13 on the editor's list, and 6 on the reader's list. In 2003, the novel was listed at number 8 on the BBC's survey The Big Read.