It looks like someone linked you here to our printer friendly page. Please make sure you go Back to Safehaven.com for more great articles just like this one!

United Statism of Amerika

By: Gordon Long | Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Excerpted from Thesis 2013: Statism. FREE at GordonTLong.com


 

Land of the Free - Some Restrictions Apply

In 'The Road to Serfdom ', F.A. Hayek showed how governments, supported by a collectivist mindset, always tend towards totalitarianism. Even the most libertarian government thus far created, the government of the United States, has slipped incrementally towards totalitarianism over the past two centuries, more noticeably since 911 and most alarmingly since the 2008 financial crisis. This is because it is an inherent trait of a government. Planned or random crisis events inevitably accelerate the process.

The degree of socialism in the United States increased substantially after the establishment of the Federal Reserve System (1913) and the measures taken during the Great Depression (1929-46) which it created. Ever since the early 1900's the United States has had a two-party system dominated by what must be labeled 'socialists'. This is because, the Republican Party has always advocated conservative socialism. The Democratic Party, which in the 19th century favored libertarianism, advocates social-democratic socialism.

Left, Right and Centre, are all forms of socialism. We may call them "social-democratic socialism" (the Left) and "conservative socialism" (the Right). They are both socialism because they both share the principle that the government should "run" and "mold" society, by using legal force and intervention to transfer property and personal wealth as part of the political scientists' process of 'redistribution of wealth'.

The differences are only in the particular ways the government should run society - the methods it should use, and who, exactly, should be the recipients of government wealth transfers and who should pay.

In particular:

Individualism vs Collectivism

So long as people are divided by Left and Right, Democratic and Republican, the US is prone to being influenced by factions who transcend party politics and from behind the scenes could possible exert strong control over the United States. They could do this by maintaining power over public opinion and hence over the course of government. Steadily, the United States has been travelling down the road to totalitarianism, and many people have not noticed, possibly because they are only looking at the position on the Left-Right paradigm.


The Expansionist US Central State

Like the sun coming up in the morning, Central State planning and expansion predictably leads to state spending exceeding the rate of the real growth of the state's economy. The US Central State has been no exception and has been relentlessly expanding faster than GDP since the 1950s with only two notable exceptions. The dot.com bubble in the late 90's and the housing bubble in the early to mid 2000s. These artificial bubbles were created by Monetary Malpractice aimed at creating desperately needed growth to support excessive spending and debt levels.

FGEXPND/GDP

What historically kills the expansionist state beast, is when debt reaches the critical point of debt saturation. This is the point where government borrowing is so pervasive that it forces total debt to grow to enable it to leverage ever smaller growth levels of an economy captured by a debt stranglehold brought on by the expansionist central state. The structural imbalance of state expenditures and revenue leads to structural deficits. This is the situation the US presently finds itself in, and is to be fully expected, when the central state is allowed to assume a larger expansionist role. Like a cancer it will insidiously and relentlessly expand unless operated on. The sooner the operation the better the chance of survival.

Blood Letting

Unfortunately, we are in denial, as the cancer grows and the quack doctors suggest more spending. Similar to 'blood letting' by medieval doctors, the diagnosis is flawed and will only accelerate the demise of the naive and dependent patient.

"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." ~ President Franklin Delano Roosevelt

The growing public dependency on US government programs may not be simply the outcome of current economic conditions. The Cloward Piven strategy outlined how by impoverishing the middle class through crushing reduction in real disposable income, while taxing the private sector into submission would result in a growing central state and increasing transfer of power to it. Unsound money is a key tenet in the impoverishment of America and thereby achieving such a strategic outcome.

For the central state to assume more authoritarian control, public support will increasingly be based on a perception of a required redistribution of wealth from the rich to the growing number of poor. Redistribution of wealth is the goal, but in reality it is from the poor to the government and to those who feed at the government trough. To better understand how this occurs we all need to fully acquaint ourselves with the Cloward Piven strategy. Frankly, it all sounds eerily familiar with what is going on around us on a daily basis.

Ty Andros at Tedbits.com has laid out in an extensive downloadable presentation on the perils of the Cloward Piven Strategy.


Cloward Piven Strategy

Consolidations

"When you rob Peter to pay Paul" - you can always count on Paul's support.


Rational Choice Theory

This is a theory advocated by the RAND Corporation, a leading public policy 'framer', which prescribes that when making any choice, an individual (or government) must act as if balancing costs against benefits to arrive at an action that maximizes personal advantage. It is intended to promote a social atmosphere of moral ambiguity in the name of personal and national priority. What it says is that the ends justify the means, and moral conscience is not a factor to be taken seriously if one wishes to be successful. It fosters the removal of questions of principle from the debate over social progress. Rational Choice propaganda commonly presents the target audience with a false conundrum. Remove all choices within a system, by force or manipulation, until the masses think they have nothing left but the choices the elites give them. It is the bread and butter of elitist institutions and is at the core of the push for globalization.

Policies of Insolvency

These are government PROGRAMS written into LAW which CONSUME more then they PRODUCE, impose large, new costs on the PUBLIC and private sector destroying PROFITABILITY. A large part of the funding has not been identified so it is PAY as you GO. This leads to national bankruptcy as funding runs out and the printing press is substituted for real income growth and declining tax receipts

Unsound money is a key tenet in achieving such a strategic outcome as Cloward Piven..

All of these rights (below), spell security. I ask the Congress to explore the means for implementing this economic bill of rights -- for it is definitely the responsibility of the Congress so to do." ~ Franklin D Roosevelt

Obama's Inauguration referenced "treating everyone fairly and equally, with dignity and respect". This is a specific reference to FDR's Bill of Rights.


Obama's 2nd Term 'FDR' Bill of Rights


The Breeding Ground for Crony Capitalism

An expansionist central state is a fertile breeding ground for the Corporatocracy's strategy of Crony Capitalism.

Money Flow - Theoretical vs Actual


We Must Not Forget

What government PLANNED crisis will emerge to TRIGGER this societal and economic collapse? This is what transpired in NAZI Germany before HITLER rose to power...

Hermann Goering - easy to bring the people to the bidding of the leaders

A significant amount of modern day work has been done and some is getting prime time attention within political framers such as the RAND Corporation.


The Statist "Lynchpin Theory"

John Casti, a Ph.D. from USC, "complexity scientist" and "systems theorist", a Futurist, and most notably, a former employee of Rand Corporation has pioneered the "Lynchpin Theory". Casti introduces his idea of "Linchpin Theory" in his book "X-Events: The Collapse Of Everything ", it offers perfect scapegoat scenarios for catastrophes that are engineered by the establishment. X-EVENTS are not some "random" event caused by uncontrolled "COMPLEXITY". This is engineered complexity with a devious purpose. The creation of the derivatives collapse was done with foreknowledge, at least by some.

According to Brandon Smith of the Alt-Market blog , Casti would like you to believe that political and social tides are unguided and chaotic; that all is random, and disaster is a product of "chance" trigger events that occur at the height of a malfunctioning and over-complicated system. Linchpin Theory argues that overt social, political, and technological "complexity" is to blame for the most destructive events in modern human history, and it is indeed an enticing suggestion for those who are uneducated and unaware of the behind the scenes mechanics of world events.

Eleven Scenarios Presently Identified by Statists to Collapse the Modern World:


Security versus Innovative Risk Taking - The Forgotten Cost of Socialist Security

What is often forgotten is that within a capitalist system and a free society, there is a balance of risk versus security. This is one of the central reasons "socialism" eventually fails. Risk cannot be eliminated; it can only be suppressed or transferred to others. If you want growth, you must reward risk and innovation and foster a culture that accepts failure and low-intensity disorder as the norm. The public cannot expect the false state promises of security without fully recognizing that it will kill risk taking, innovation and growth and foster the crony capitalism feeding off the less risky public trough. Expansionist central states ALWAYS make promises it has no ability to deliver on without effectively 'killing the golden goose'.

The Risk-Security Seesaw

It must never be forgotten, that government by its nature is parasitic. It creates no wealth and lives off the wealth creation of others through its authoritarian powers to legally confiscate and seize. This is a fact, no matter how well intentions the public perceives the governments intentions to be.

"Many people want the government to protect the consumer. A much more urgent problem is to protect the consumer from the government". ~ Nobel Laureate in Economics, Milton Friedman


The Obsolete Concept of "Central State'

My co-host at Macro Analytics, Charles Hugh Smith has expanded his work on the 's' curve to show Why Expansionist Central States Inevitably Implode .

The Lifecycle of the Expansionist Central State

Contrary to what the central planners want, the whole notion of a central state is now obsolete. Technology now makes this possible and growing social unrest and a Crisis of Trust will soon demand it. We can fully expect those with political power and its need for control to restrict this change in every manner possible. The lifecycle of the expansionist central state is coming to a close for many natural reason. Some of these phenomenon include:

These notions are explored in the video: RIP: Our Expansionist Central State


Conclusions

The central state within the United Statism of Amerika has a strategy and a plan to expand its power and control. It is a plan that will transform the United States from Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World" to george Orwell's "1984".

Huxley - Orwell Transition

The plan will fail if "we the people" recognize what is happening.

Recognition gives the people the power to stop what is happening!

The People Don't Know Their True Power

 


Sign Up for our FREE 2013 Thesis Paper.

To read more, go to GordonTLong.com

 

Author: Gordon Long

Gordon T. Long
Publisher - LONGWave

Gordon T. Long

Gordon T. Long has been publically offering his financial and economic writing since 2010, following a career internationally in technology, senior management & investment finance. He brings a unique perspective to macroeconomic analysis because of his broad background, which is not typically found or available to the public.

Mr. Long was a senior group executive with IBM and Motorola for over 20 years. Earlier in his career he was involved in Sales, Marketing & Service of computing and network communications solutions across an extensive array of industries. He subsequently held senior positions, which included: VP & General Manager, Four Phase (Canada); Vice President Operations, Motorola (MISL - Canada); Vice President Engineering & Officer, Motorola (Codex - USA).

After a career with Fortune 500 corporations, he became a senior officer of Cambex, a highly successful high tech start-up and public company (Nasdaq: CBEX), where he spearheaded global expansion as Executive VP & General Manager.

In 1995, he founded the LCM Groupe in Paris, France to specialize in the rapidly emerging Internet Venture Capital and Private Equity industry. A focus in the technology research field of Chaos Theory and Mandelbrot Generators lead in the early 2000's to the development of advanced Technical Analysis and Market Analytics platforms. The LCM Groupe is a recognized source for the most advanced technical analysis techniques employed in market trading pattern recognition.

Mr. Long presently resides in Boston, Massachusetts, continuing the expansion of the LCM Groupe's International Private Equity opportunities in addition to their core financial market trading platforms expertise. GordonTLong.com is a wholly owned operating unit of the LCM Groupe.

Gordon T. Long is a graduate Engineer, University of Waterloo (Canada) in Thermodynamics-Fluid Mechanics (Aerodynamics). On graduation from an intensive 5 year specialized Co-operative Engineering program he pursued graduate business studies at the prestigious Ivy Business School, University of Western Ontario (Canada) on a Northern & Central Gas Corporation Scholarship. He was subsequently selected to attend advanced one year training with the IBM Corporation in New York prior to starting his career with IBM.

Gordon T Long is not a registered advisor and does not give investment advice. His comments are an expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity or any other financial instrument at any time. While he believes his statements to be true, they always depend on the reliability of his own credible sources. Of course, he recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction, before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments.

The information herein was obtained from sources which Mr. Long believes reliable, but he does not guarantee its accuracy. None of the information, advertisements, website links, or any opinions expressed constitutes a solicitation of the purchase or sale of any securities or commodities. Please note that Mr. Long may already have invested or may from time to time invest in securities that are recommended or otherwise covered on this website. Mr. Long does not intend to disclose the extent of any current holdings or future transactions with respect to any particular security. You should consider this possibility before investing in any security based upon statements and information contained in any report, post, comment or recommendation you receive from him.

Copyright © 2010-2014 Gordon T. Long