Safehaven | Doo-Doo Bank Drill Down: Part 1 - Wells Fargo

June 01, 2008

Doo-Doo Bank Drill Down: Part 1 - Wells Fargo
by Reggie Middleton

This is the first of several drill downs into the list of 32 banks in deep doo-doo. Before I go on, let's outline the articles in this series thus far...

The Asset Securitization Crisis Analysis roadmap to date:

Intro: The great housing bull run - creation of asset bubble, Declining lending standards, lax underwriting activities increased the bubble - A comparison with the same during the S&L crisis
Securitization - dissimilarity between the S&L and the Subprime Mortgage crises, The bursting of housing bubble - declining home prices and rising foreclosure
Counterparty risk analyses - counterparty failure will open up another Pandora's box
The consumer finance sector risk is woefully unrecognized, and the US Federal reserve to the rescue
Municipal bond market and the securitization crisis - part I
An overview of my personal Regional Bank short prospects Part I: PNC Bank - risky loans skating on razor thin capital, PNC addendum Posts One and Two
Reggie Middleton says don't believe Paulson: S&L crisis 2.0, bank failure redux
More on the banking backdrop, we've never had so many loans!
As I see it, these 32 banks and thrfts are in deep doo-doo!
A little more on HELOCs, 2nd lien loans and rose colored glasses
Will Countywdiw cause the next shoe to drop?
Capital, Leverage and Loss in the Banking System

Well, the first bank on the drill down list will also be 2nd of the banks that I will deliver a forensic analysis on (the first was PNC Bank). That bank is,,, (drum roll in the backgroud, crescendo.... I know some of you hate it when I do this........) Wells Fargo! I can hear a few of you naysayers cackling behind your computer screens as I type this. Wells Fargo is a big name brand bank (cackle, cackle)! Wells Fargo has Warren Buffet as its largest investor (cackle, cackle)! Wells Fargo this and that and blah, blah and (cackle, cackle).... All I can say is, beware of name brands (I actually felt compelled to address this in earlier posts). I have made more than a couple of dollars benefiting from name brand hubris and smaller investors who would rather be told what to do than read a balance sheet! Time will tell if I am right or not on Wells Fargo, just be forewarned - several of the banks on teh Doo-Doo 32 list have already taken a trip to the confessional! The score card for the credit crisis to date, Reggie Middleton - 10, big name brand investors - 0 (not to toot my own horn, I'm sort of a modest guy and I know I have a big mistake/loss coming soon, it just isn't going to be this one). I actually have a lot of respect for Buffet, though. Hell of a fundamental investor and cash flow king, and charming public persona as well as being modest (at least he's got me beat). My appreciation differs from that of many, though. His investment track record is quite impressive for it stands the test of time as consistent. As a smaller, unknown investor, he was the most impressive, but now he is an icon and his very words and even a scent of investment from him actually moves markets. Even though he has a much larger capital base to work from (which makes it harder to generate large proportionate returns), his influence can be confused for investment acumen. All in all, he is one to be admired, but the investment results stemming from alpha have to be seperated from the ability to manipulate and move the market (unless that actual ability can be defined as alpha - topic for another day). We all make mistakes though, and Wells Fargo is a mistake waiting to happen. Let's walk through this company as I see it. Of course, since Wells Fargo failed to cooperate with me in releasing their numbers, I used statistical data to back into their probable delinquincies where they weren't directly available from their public filings.

Wells Fargo Observations

Loan portfolio:

Large exposure in Construction and Development (C&D) loans: Of its total loans of $386 bn, Wells Fargo (WFC) had $19 bn exposure in construction and development loans in 1Q2008. WFC's exposure was the fourth largest among all US banks in absolute amount after Bank of America, Wachovia and BB&T, comprising nearly 36% of its shareholder's equity (this is unadjusted for bullsh1t).In 1Q2008, C&D loans witnessed the highest stress with NPA to loan ratio of 2.32%, followed by real estate 1-4 family first mortgage with NPAs to loan ratio of 1.91%. C&D NPAs (Non-performing or dead assets) witnessed a 114% increase over 1Q2007 and 38% increase over 4Q2007. In Wells Fargo loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2007 California represented nearly 32% of total C&D loans, Florida represents 5%. These areas are experiencing extreme stress due to thier high (the highest in the country) residential delinquency, foreclosure and REO rates.

This stress is real, and is already causing losses in the condo construction and sales markets, retail malls and now office buildings. Please see my primer and series on the Commercial Real Estate Crash and ongoing series of financial shenanigans and excessive debt issues of General Growth Properties for additional information.

Sizeable Real Estate loans exposure in troubled markets: Wells Fargo had $148 bn loan in 1-4 Family Mortgages (WFC has a high correlation to industry-wide losses) which represented nearly 38% of the banks' total loan. Out of these loans nearly 51% comprised junior lien mortgage loans (much higher probability of total loss and no recovery). After C&D loans, real estate loans have highest NPAs as proportion of total loans. In 4Q2007, real estate 1-4 family first mortgage NPAs to total loans stood at nearly 1.91% of total loans with total NPAs of $1.4 bn. In terms of geographic exposure, real estate loans from California and Florida comprised 33% and 4% of total real estate loans (i.e 13% and 2% of WFC's total loan portfolio).

WELLS FARGO	*1Q-2008*	*4Q-2007*	*3Q-2007*	*2Q-2007*
*Loan Composition*
Commercial	92,589	90,468	82,598	77,560
Other real estate mortgage	38,415	36,747	33,227	32,336
Real estate construction	18,885	18,854	17,301	16,552
Lease financing	6,885	6,772	6,089	5,979
Total commercial and commercial real estate	156,774	152,841	139,215	132,427
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage	73,321	71,415	66,877	61,177
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage	74,840	75,565	74,632	72,398
Credit card	18,677	18,762	17,129	15,567
Other revolving credit and installment	55,505	56,171	57,180	53,701
Total consumer	222,343	221,913	215,818	202,843
Foreign	7,216	7,441	7,889	7,530

Total Loans	386,333	382,195	362,922	342,800

Wells Fargo haa increased their loan assets every quarter for the past 4 quarters. Those past 4 quarters are just past the peak of the largest equity real asset and credit bubble of the century? Question: Why is Wells Fargo increasing the amount of these quickly depreciating assets on its books while the underlying properties are rapidly decreasing in price?

Large Second Lien Home Equity exposure with rising NPAs: As of 3Q2007, Wells Fargo had second highest home equity loans exposure among all US banks in absolute amount. In 1Q2008, Wells Fargo had $83 bn loans in home equity comprising nearly 19% of total loans and a staggering 174% of its shareholder's equity.

Within its home equity exposure 37% of loans are in California comprising 7% of its total loan or 64% of its shareholders equity.
In 1Q2008 Wells Fargo's annualized loss rate on home equity loan portfolio increased to 2.12% from 1.42% in December 31, 2007.
As of December 31, 2007 nearly 29% of the bank's home equity exposure had LTV greater than 90%. With housing prices expected to continue to decline over the reminder of 2008, Wells Fargo's significant exposure in high LTV home equity loans with concentration towards California could pose a much harder time for the bank in the quarters to come.

A more granular view of Wells Fargo's loan portfolio shows us the following (I've highlighted areas to take notice of)...

WELLS FARGO	*1Q-2008*	*4Q-2007*	*3Q-2007*	*2Q-2007*
*% Change*
Commercial	2.3%	9.5%	6.5%	7.3%
Other real estate mortgage	4.5%	10.6%	2.8%	2.5%
Real estate construction	0.2%	9.0%	4.5%	4.3%
Lease financing	1.7%	11.2%	1.8%	8.8%
Total commercial and commercial real estate	*2.6%*	*9.8%*	*5.1%*	*5.8%*
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage	2.7%	6.8%	9.3%	9.3%
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage	-1.0%	1.3%	3.1%	4.2%
Credit card	-0.5%	9.5%	10.0%	6.7%
Other revolving credit and installment	-1.2%	-1.8%	6.5%	0.5%
Total consumer	*0.2%*	*2.8%*	*6.4%*	*4.8%*
Foreign	-3.0%	-5.7%	4.8%	10.7%

*Total Loans*	*1.1%*	*5.3%*	*5.9%*	*5.3%*


*Loans 90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing*
Commercial	29	32
Other real estate mortgage	24	10	140% increase??
Real estate construction	15	24
Lease financing	68	66
Total commercial and commercial real estate	314	286
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage	228	201
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage	449	402
Other revolving credit and installment	532	552
Total consumer	1,523	1,441
Foreign	40	52

Total Non Accural Loans	1,631	1,559

Increasing provisions and chare-offs

In 1Q2008, WFC's NPAs increased from 1.16% of total loans over 1.01% in 4Q2007. Overall NPAs increased to $4.5 bn from $3.9 bn in 4Q2007. NPAs in real estate construction loans witnessed highest increase of 49% to $438 mn in 1Q2008. NPAs of C&D loans stood at 2.32% of total C&D loans, followed by real estate 1-4 family mortgage (1.91%) and lease financing (0.83%)
Wells Fargo's gross charge offs increased to 0.46% of total loans compared to 0.37% of total loans in 4Q2007. C&D loans witnessed the highest increase in charge-offs with an increase of nearly three-fold to $29 mn in 1Q2008, showing signs of increased stress in these loans. Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage, credit card loans and Other revolving credit and installment had charge-offs of 0.61%, 1.68% and 0.98% to total loans, respectively.
However despite increase in NPAs and increase in charge offs, Wells Fargo provision for credit loss sequentially declined to $2.0 bn in 1Q2008 from $2.6 bn in 4Q2007. (0.52% of total loans in 1Q2008 from 0.68% of total loans in 4Q2007) raising concerns over possible inadequacy of provision amount.
From April 1, 2008 onwards, Wells Fargo has changed its home equity charge-off policy to 180 days from 120 days previously. Amid current deteriorating credit markets with residential sector showing no signs of recovery, it is quite understandable that the bank has changed the policy in a bid to defer recognition of provision and charge-offs.

WELLS FARGO	*1Q-2008*	*4Q-2007*

*Delinquincie as a % of Loans*
Commercial	0.03%	0.04%
Other real estate mortgage	0.06%	0.03%
Real estate construction	0.08%	0.13%
Lease financing	0.99%	0.97%
Total commercial and commercial real estate	*0.20%*	*0.19%*
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage	0.31%	0.28%
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage	0.60%	0.53%
Other revolving credit and installment	0.96%	0.98%
Total consumer	*0.68%*	*0.65%*
Foreign	0.55%	0.70%

Total Non Accural Loans	*0.42%*	*0.41%*


*NPA's*
Commercial	588	432
Other real estate mortgage	152	128
Real estate construction	438	293
Lease financing	57	45
Total commercial and commercial real estate	1,235	898
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage	1,398	1,272
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage	381	280
Other revolving credit and installment	196	184
Total consumer	1,975	1,736
Foreign	49	45

Total Non Accural Loans	3,259	2,679


GNMA loans	578	535
Other	637	649
Real estate and other nonaccrual investments	21	5

Foreclosed assets:	1,236	1,189



Total NPA's	4,495	3,868

I'd like to repeat this so it is not wasted on anybody: From April 1, 2008 onwards, Wells Fargo has changed its home equity charge-off policy to 180 days from 120 days previously. Amid current deteriorating credit markets with residential sector showing no signs of recovery, it is quite understandable that the bank has changed the policy in a bid to defer recognition of provision and charge-offs.

So, have the implemented this policy in other areas after the last filing, or previously without disclosing it. Did I miss it in the footnotes somewhere? Now, all of their delinquincies and NPA numbers are suspect! See chart below...

WELLS FARGO	*1Q-2008*	*4Q-2007*

*Delinquincie as a % of Loans*			% increase
Commercial	0.03%	0.04%	-11%	<----- Questionable!
Other real estate mortgage	0.06%	0.03%	130%
Real estate construction	0.08%	0.13%	-38%	<----- Questionable!
Lease financing	0.99%	0.97%	1%
Total commercial and commercial real estate	*0.20%*	*0.19%*	7%
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage	0.31%	0.28%	10%
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage	0.60%	0.53%	13%
Other revolving credit and installment	0.96%	0.98%	-2%	<----- Questionable!
Total consumer	*0.68%*	*0.65%*	5%
Foreign	0.55%	0.70%	-21%	<----- Questionable!

Total Non Accural Loans	*0.42%*	*0.41%*

WELLS FARGO	*1Q-2008*	*4Q-2007*	*3Q-2007*	*2Q-2007*	*1Q-2007*
						Latest Quarter Growth
Provision as % of Loans	*0.52%*	*0.68%*	*0.25%*	*0.21%*	*0.22%*	-23%	Loss cushions decreasing
Provision as % of NPA's	*45%*	*68%*	*28%*	*27%*	*27%*	-33%	Loss cushions decreasing
Gross Charge off to Loans	*0.46%*	*0.37%*	*0.30%*	*0.28%*	*0.29%*	22%	Losses increasing
Gross Charge off to NPA's	*39%*	*37%*	*35%*	*35%*	*36%*	6%	Losses increasing
Allowances as % of Loans	*1.56%*	*1.44%*	*1.11%*	*1.17%*	*1.22%*	8%	Allowances for loans increase
Allowances as % of NPA's	*134%*	*143%*	*126%*	*148%*	*149%*	-6%	But allowances as % of what's needed >
NPA's to Loans	*1.16%*	*1.01%*	*0.88%*	*0.79%*	*0.82%*	15%	NPAs increasing substantially, this number is also in doubt
Shareholder's equity	48,159	47,628	47,566	47,239	46,073	1%
Goodwill	13,148	13,106	12,018	11,983	11,275	0%	Goodwill is increasing along with Charge-offs/NPAs, HMMM!!!
Adjusted Equity	35,011	34,522	35,548	35,256	34,798	1%

I expect recoveries in the red font below to drop precipitously. The yellow highlight shows where there is already weaknes in recoveries in earier quarters.

WELLS FARGO	1Q 2008	4Q 2007	3Q 2007	2Q 2007	1Q 2007
*Recoveries*						% increase	% of total
Commercial	31	35	35	25	24	-11%	13%
Other real estate mortgage	1	1	2	3	2	0%	0%
Real estate construction	1	0	1	0	1	100%	0%
Lease financing	3	5	3	4	5	-40%	1%
Total commercial and commercial real estate	36	41	41	32	32	-12%	15%
Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage	6	4	6	6	6	50%	3%
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage	17	14	14	16	9	21%	7%
Credit Card	38	30	29	30	31	27%	16%
Other revolving credit and installment	125	111	105	139	149	13%	53%
Total consumer	186	159	154	191	195	17%	79%
Foreign	14	15	15	17	18	-7%	6%

Total Recoveries	236	215	210	240	245	10%	100%

Extraordinary gains offsetting loan write-downs in 1Q2008

• Out of net income of $ 1,999 mn in 1Q2008, Wells Fargo recorded an extraordinary gain of $323 mn and $94 mn on gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities and increase in mortgage servicing income, respectively. These gains were partially offset by $263 mn write-down of mortgage loans and $63 mn write-down on commercial mortgages held for sale. Additionally the bank also recorded unrealized loss on securities available for sale of $598 mn in 1Q2008 compared with unrealized gain of $680 mn in 4Q2007. Be aware of the margin for abuse in valuing MSRs (mortgage servicing rights, etc.). If the mortgage is likely to go into default and be foreclosed upon, it is unlikely the servicer will be able to monetize future revenue streams from servicing the mortgage. Also, be aware on non-descript mark ups and gains. The entire world had to eat sh1t due to plummeting MBS values for almost a year with literally no market for these securities. How did those genius at WFC manage to sell their MBS securities with little or no market, and sell them at a gain of $323 million on top of it. The guys at Countrywide, Lehman, Bear Stearns, Morgan Stanley, Merriill Lynch, UBS, HBOS, and a whole hell of a lotta other folk (including me) are dying to know!

The Investment Bank Shell Game Trick - Adopted by the Commercial Banks? Reclassification of Level 2 and Level 3 assets to record gains

• As of December 31, 2007 Wells Fargo's level 2 and level 3 assets comprise of 49% and 18% of total assets (on fair value basis) representing $61 bn and $23 bn of level 2 and level 3 assets, respectively in 1Q2007. It also reclassified its assets from level 3 to level 2 to recognize gain to offset losses arising from higher provision. Come on now fellas! Since you can't observe marketable prices for these assets, and no one wants to buy them, and no one is aware of a market for them - you just make up whatever the hell you want. It may as well be a profitable number to record a gain, right? What the hell is the use of making up a value if you can't do it to your benefit?

A likely example of this parlour trick classification could be the CDO's onWells Fargos books (which we know nobody really wants right now). Look carefully:

Investments in Collateralized Debt Obligations	AAA	AA-BBB	Other	Total
Corporate credit	13	292	217	522	Junk CDO's as % of Total 25.23%
Bank or insurance trust preferred	257	37	0	294	Junk CDO's as % of Total 25.23%
Commercial mortgage	24	20	0	44	AA-BBB CDOS as % of Total40.58%
Residential mortgage	0	0	0	0	AA-BBB CDOS as % of Total40.58%
Total	294	349	217	860

FAS 157 Overview - Like Morgan Stanley and Lehman Brothers, Wells Fargo seems to somehow think we should believe those assets that can't be sold and can't be priced are worth more after they can't be sold and can't be priced than.

	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
Trading assets	1,041	6,268	418	7,727
Securities available for sale	38,178	29,392	5,381	72,951
Mortgages held for sale	0	24,852	146	24,998
Mortgage servicing rights (residential)	0	0	16,763	16,763
Other assets	1,145	207	41	1,393
Total	40,364	60,719	22,749	123,832
% of total	33%	49%	18%

Portfolio overview

Loan Portfolio (March, 2008)
	Loan Portfolio	% of Total	NPA	% of Total NPA	NPA/ Loans	Charge- offs	% of NPA	% of Loans
Commercial and commercial real estate:
Commercial	92,589	24%	588	18%	0.64%	259	44%	0.28%
Other real estate mortgage	38,415	10%	152	5%	0.40%	4	3%	0.01%
Real estate construction	18,885	4.9%	438	13%	2.32%	29	7%	0.15%
Lease financing	6,885	2%	57	2%	0.83%	12	21%	0.17%
Total commercial and commercial real estate	156,774	*41%*	1,235	38%	0.79%	304	25%	0.19%

Real estate 1-4 family first mortgage	73,321	19%	1,398	43%	1.91%	81	6%	0.11%
Real estate 1-4 family junior lien mortgage	74,840	19%	381	12%	0.51%	455	119%	0.61%
Credit card	18,677	5%	0	0%	0.00%	313		1.68%
Other revolving credit and installment	55,505	14%	196	6%	0.35%	543	277%	0.98%
Total consumer	222,343	*58%*	1,975	61%	0.89%	1,392	70%	0.63%

Foreign	7,216	2%	49	2%	0.68%	68	139%	0.94%

Total Loans	386,333	*100%*	3,259	100%	0.84%	1,764	54%	0.46%

High Risk Product Overview

• Starting in 2007, Wells Fargo segregated its national home equity group into liquidating and core (or remaining) portfolios in order to manage the riskier HE loans more efficiently. The HE loans generated through wholesale channels and not behind a Wells Fargo first mortgage, and all home equity loans acquired through correspondents, were identified and clubbed under a liquidating portfolio which amounted to $11.5 bn as on Mar 31, 2008 (total HE portfolio as on that date was $83.5 bn). Long story short, it is much more dangerous to rely on prudent underwriting from a brokered loan than from a direct channel loan. Amazingly enough, we had the exact same problem with brokers in the S&L crisis. I guess 1,200+ lending institution failures wasn't enough to teach a lesson that lasted more than 15 years. For more on this, see A comparison with the same during the S&L crisis.

• As per the bank's 2007 annual report, the loans in the liquidating HE portfolio are largely concentrated in geographic markets that have experienced the most abrupt and steepest declines in housing prices.

• The liquidating HE portfolio represents the most risky portion of the bank's HE portfolio as highlighted by an annualized loss rate (two payments or more past due %) of 5.6% for liquidating portfolio against 1.6% for the core portfolio in 1Q08.

*HOME EQUITY (March 31, 2008)*							% of loans two payments or more past due		Annalized Loss Rate
	Liquidating	Core	Total	*% of Home Equity*	*% of Toal Loans*	*Deliquency rates*	Liquidating	Core	Liquidating	Core	Total
California	4,417	26,331	30,748	37%	7%	3.5%	3.3%	2.0%	8.5%	2.2%
Florida	582	2,595	3,177	4%	1%	3.8%	5.4%	3.8%	10.6%	4.4%
Arizona	275	3,785	4,060	5%	1%	2.3%	3.4%	1.9%	5.6%	1.9%
Texas	219	2,805	3,024	4%	1%	2.3%	0.7%	1.1%	1.9%	0.2%
Minnesota	139	4,546	4,685	6%	1%	1.5%	3.1%	1.2%	7.9%	1.1%
Other	5,866	31,994	37,860	45%	8%	1.9%	2.2%	1.4%	3.0%	1.0%

Total	11,498	72,056	83,554	*100%*	*19%*	*2.5%*	*2.8%*	*1.7%*	*5.6%*	*1.6%*	*2.1%*

Real Estate 1-4 Family Mortgage Loans by State (December 31, 2007)								% of family mortgage real estate
	First mortgage		Deliquency rates	Junior lien mortgage		Deliquency rates	Total	% of family mortgage real estate
California	20,782	29.1%	5.1%	28,234	37%	12.0%	49,016	33%
Minnesota	3,009	4.2%	3.6%	4,209	6%	4.4%	7,218	5%
Arizona	2,986	4.2%	5.3%	3,451	5%	6.9%	6,437	4%
Florida	3,127	4.4%	7.0%	2,851	4%	11.4%	5,978	4%
Colorado	2,612	3.7%	3.5%	2,889	4%	5.9%	5,501	4%
Washington	2,476	3.5%	2.4%	2,938	4%	3.5%	5,414	4%
Texas	3,551	5.0%	4.6%	1,805	2%	4.2%	5,356	4%
New York	2,200	3.1%	4.1%	2,275	3%	4.1%	4,475	3%
Nevada	1,625	2.3%	6.6%	1,642	2%	9.9%	3,267	2%
Illinois	1,616	2.3%	3.9%	1,444	2%	4.7%	3,060	2%
Other	27,431	38.4%	3.8%	23,827	32%	4.5%	51,258	35%

Total	71,415	100%	4.4%	75,565	100%	7.8%	146,980	*100%*

Commercial Real Estate Loans by State (December 31, 2007)
	Other real estate	Real estate const	Total	% of CRE	% of Total Loans	Deliquency rates		% of Real Estate cons
California	13,922	6,050	19,972	36%	5%	5.1%	California	32%
Texas	2,934	1,135	4,069	7%	1%	4.6%	Texas	6%
Arizona	1,926	1,262	3,188	6%	1%	5.1%	Arizona	7%
Colorado	1,669	873	2,542	5%	1%	3.5%	Colorado	5%
Washington	1,441	652	2,093	4%	1%	2.3%	Washington	3%
Minnesota	1,319	382	1,701	3%	0%	3.5%	Minnesota	2%
Florida	636	913	1,549	3%	0%	6.8%	Florida	5%
Utah	719	581	1,300	2%	0%	3.3%	Utah	3%
New York	331	949	1,280	2%	0%	3.9%	New York	5%
Oregon	803	441	1,244	2%	0%	2.5%	Oregon	2%
Other	11,047	5,616	16,663	30%	4%	3.7%	Other	30%

Total	36,747	18,854	55,601	100%	14%	4.3%	Total	*100%*

I will produce a valuation report for WFC soon, as well as a few more drill downs from the Doo-Doo 32 list.

Reggie Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/

Who am I?

Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis. I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition, a contrarian to the nth degree.

Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance, I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available, regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as I am and our constituency.

I pay for significant information and data, and am well aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available - to both individuals and institutions.

So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute, as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to be.

Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks, hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and success to heart.

So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering, real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to know more about me.

Visit his blog Boom Bust Blog.