Safehaven | Reggie Middleton on Goldman Sachs Q3 2008

September 17, 2008

Reggie Middleton on Goldman Sachs Q3 2008
by Reggie Middleton

As in Morgan Stanley (The Riskiest Bank on the Street and Reggie Middleton on the Street's Riskiest Bank - Update), Lehman Brothers (Is Lehman a Lying Lemming?), and Bear Stearns (Bear Fight - A most bearish view on Bear Stearns in a bear market and Is this the Breaking of the Bear's Back?), I am bearish on Goldman as well (Goldman Sachs Snapshot: Risk vs. Reward vs. Reputations on the Street and Reggie Middleton on Risk, Reward and Reputations on the Street: the Goldman Sachs Forensic Analysis). They have carried a very high, and in my opinion, unjustified valuation premium at a time when their business cycle has passed its nadir and the macro environment is crumbling around them as they carry a boatload of bad assets.

In 3Q2008 Goldman Sachs net revenues declined 51% to $6,043 mn compared with $12,334 mn in 3Q2007 as all the segments witnessed steep decline in their revenues.

Investment banking revenues declined 40% y-o-y to $1,294 mn from $2,145 mn in 3Q2007. Trading and principal investments revenues and asset management segment revenues declined 68% and 8% y-o-y to $2,440 mn and $1,174 mn, respectively in 3Q2008. Interest income and interest expense reported a decline of 32% and 34%, respectively to $8,717 mn and $7,562 mn, respectively.

In line with drop in revenues, compensation expenses declined 51% to $2,901 mn. As a result the ratio of compensation expenses-to-net revenues stood flat at 48% in 3Q2008. Non-compensation expenses increased marginally by 1% to $2,182 mn off higher deprecation and amortization expenses with ratio of non-compensation expenses-to-net revenues increasing steeply to 36.1% from 17.5% in 3Q2007 (excpect to see painful cost cutting). Goldman Sachs pre-tax earnings declined 53% to $5,935 mn form $12,549 mn in 3Q2007.

Overall Goldman Sachs net income available to common shareholders' declined 47% to $4,328 mn (or $9.62 per share) from $8,241 mn (or $17.75 per share) in 3Q2007.

Due to increased volatility Goldman Sachs average daily VaR increased 30% to $181 mn over previous year. I saw this coming last quarter, and it is a strong chance that it will blow up in thier face. Reference my post about their previous quarter concerning risk adjusted performance. As it turns out, it was rather prescient:

Risk vs. Reward is what the successful investor looks at when gauging an oppurtunity. The Street and the media are just looking at reward in regards to Goldman Sachs!

We have looked at company's recent quarterly filings and 10K to have a closer view of Goldman Sachs' (GS) exposure. Following are some of our observations:

Value at Risk (VAR) and Risk Adjusted Return on Risk Adjusted Capital (RARORAC)

Goldman has the highest VAR among its peer group of $184 mn, followed by Lehman at distant $123 mn (we all know how well LEH is currently faring). Notably, GS also the highest range (difference of highest and lowest daily VAR during a quarter) of daily trading VAR of $92 million, reflecting significant (read risky) volatility in its trading portfolio. This is higher than $61 mn and $67 mn (for 1Q2008) for Lehman and JPM, respectively. This is also being reflected in the lowest risk adjusted return on risk adjusted capital (RARORAC - a much more grounded measure of risk adjusted return) of 14.8% for GS among its peer group. Just so this doesn't escape anybody, GS has the lowest risk adjusted return on the Street. Simply analyzing earnings (or looking at CNBC) would lead one to believe that Goldman has the highest return on investment, but unfortunately, the world is a bit more complex than an earnings statement or a cable news channel.

Average Daily Trading VAR
(in million dollars) Q208 Q108 Q407 Q307

Goldman Sachs 184 157 138 139

Morgan Stanley 99 97 89 87

Merrill Lynch NA 65 65 76

Lehman Brothers 123 130 124 96

JPM NA 122 107 112

Range of Daily Trading VAR
(Difference between highs and
lows) (in million dollars) Q208 Q108 Q407 Q307

Goldman Sachs NA 92 77 68

Morgan Stanley NA 34 46 36

Merrill Lynch NA 39 51 32

Lehman Brothers 37 61 107 66

JPM NA 67 138 64

Risk Adjusted return
on risk adjusted
capital (RARORAC) Q208 Q108 Q407 Q307

Goldman Sachs 12.9% 14.8% 16.1% 15.3%

Morgan Stanley 19.7% 19.1% 21.5% 23.3%

Merrill Lynch NA 31.6% 32.5% 30.5%

Lehman Brothers 14.0% 12.3% 12.0% 15.3%

JPM NA 54.1% 60.2% 56.8%

Goldman also has the highest adjusted leverage ratio (adjusted asset divided by adjusted equity) of 18.6x (for 1Q2008) among its peer group, reflecting lower equity cushion against any valuation write-down or loss. This highest leverage portends much greater volatility in economic earnigns. In other words, when the win chooses not to blow in their direction, the sh1t will hit the fan that much harder than the rest of the Street

Adjusted leverage ratio Q208 Q108 Q407 Q307

Goldman Sachs NA 18.6x 17.5x 18.0x

Morgan Stanley 14.1x 16.0x 17.6x 18.8x

Merrill Lynch NA 18.2x 20.3x 17.9x

Lehman Brothers 12.0x 15.4x 16.1x 16.1x

JPM NA 13.1x 12.7x 12.3x

Click here for a worksheet that illustrates the VaR exposure for all ofthe big US brokers in detail: Broker VaR Worksheet (634.49 kB 2008-07-05 09:25:24).

Goldman Sachs level 3 assets to total assets declined marginally to 6.7% of total assets as of August 2008 as against 6.9% and 7.2% 2Q2008 and 3Q2007, respectively.

Reggie Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/

Who am I?

Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis. I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition, a contrarian to the nth degree.

Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance, I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available, regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as I am and our constituency.

I pay for significant information and data, and am well aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available - to both individuals and institutions.

So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute, as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to be.

Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks, hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and success to heart.

So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering, real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to know more about me.

Visit his blog Boom Bust Blog.