|
After its worst year in living memory, the stock market is due for a bit of
relief. Whether it turns out to be a dead cat bounce or a cyclical bottom remains
to be seen. But some heavyweight bears are now placing their bets on the long
side. Among them:
Steve
Leuthold, Leuthold Weeden Capital
March 4 (Bloomberg) -- Steve Leuthold, whose Grizzly Short Fund returned 74
percent last year betting against U.S. stocks, said now is the time to buy
equities because investors are too fearful about the economy. "These comparisons
people make with the Great Depression are totally out of touch with reality,
and pretty stupid," he told Bloomberg Television in an interview today. "We've
been in much worse, much more panicked and more scary situations in the U.S."
The economy isn't as bad as it was in 1974, when stocks began rebounding,
said Leuthold, who oversees $3.2 billion at Leuthold Weeden Capital Management
in Minneapolis. He predicted the Standard & Poor's 500 Index will surge
to at least 1,000 in 2009, representing a gain of 44 percent from yesterday's
12-year low of 696.33. Because a rally is likely, Leuthold said investors shouldn't
buy his Grizzly Short Fund. It has returned 26 percent in 2009.
Bill
Fleckenstein, Fleckenstein Capital
After considerable thought and deliberation I have decided to make a major
change in my life: I am going to close my hedge fund. I have several reasons
for no longer wishing to run a short-only fund as I have for the past 12 years.
First, my original reason for starting the fund was because of developments
I saw occurring in the late 1990s that I wanted no part of. I felt that Greenspan
was fomenting an environment that would lead to disaster, as consultants, financial
advisors, and the public at large were losing all respect for risk. Of course,
the reckless behavior carried far higher and lasted much, much longer than
I ever imagined it could. However, the recent carnage in the stock market,
real estate market and the financial system (as well as the job losses) has
washed away those excesses to a large degree and it has violently demonstrated
the risks associated with investing.
A future goal of mine, when I set up the fund in 1996 -- as I attempted to
step aside from the madness -- was to return to the long side of the business
at some point in time when I felt that investors had become more rational regarding
risk and stocks offered a more favorable risk/reward proposition. I considered
this option very briefly in 2002 after the stock bubble imploded, but the cleansing
process was postponed due to the burgeoning real-estate bubble.
Second, though I think that the stock market still has unfinished business
on the downside, I believe that 2009 is the year to prepare for a return to
managing money in a more balanced fashion, with longs (and some shorts), as
there are currently plenty of interesting ideas that appear to offer a margin
of safety. On the flipside, compelling opportunities on the short side are
not as abundant as they were just a few months ago (though there still are
plenty.) The "value restoration project," to quote Jim Grant, has been brought
about by the consequences of disastrous Fed policies and the madness of the
crowd, both of which have concerned me for the last 15 or so years.
Robert
Prechter, Elliott Wave International
Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Elliott Wave International Inc.'s Robert Prechter,
who advised shorting U.S. stocks three months before the bear market began,
said investors should end that bet after the Standard & Poor's 500 Index
tumbled to a 12-year low. He warned of a "sharp and scary" rebound for anyone
still wagering on a retreat, according to this month's "Elliott Wave Theorist." Short
selling is the sale of borrowed stock in the hope of profiting by buying the
securities later at a lower price and returning them to the shareholder.
"This is an environment of escalating financial chaos," wrote Prechter, famous
for cautioning that stocks would crash two weeks before the Black Monday retreat
in 1987. "Our main job is to keep the money we have. If we exit now, we will
do that."
The S&P 500 has sunk 52 percent since its October 2007 record as financial
firms worldwide posted $1.11 trillion in credit-related losses and the U.S.,
Europe and Japan fell into the first simultaneous recessions since World War
II. In July 2007, Prechter advised shorting U.S. stocks, saying "aggressive
speculators should return to a fully leveraged short position."
Dominic
Frisby, Commodity Watch Radio
Could we see a buying opportunity?
It is a characteristic of bull markets that sell-offs are short, sharp, violent
and bigger-than-expected - so much so that people question whether the bull
market is still intact. The same applies to bear markets, only in reverse.
You get these sudden, short-covering spikes up as traders who've been betting
on falls rush to cover their positions. These spikes - if timed well - can
be good money-making opportunities for those who have the spare cash to dabble
in short-term trades.
I think we could be reaching one such opportunity - and it could come as soon
as Thursday. Here's why...
Here is a long-term, log chart of the S&P. As you can see by the red trend
lines, there is a clear, long-term channel in place. We have come back to the
lower line of the channel. That is, technically, a likely place to find a bottom.

As trader Michael Hampton of Global Edge Investors observes, what is interesting
is that we have also retraced to the levels of late 1996 when the S&P broke
out above that long-term channel. The markets have come back to 'revisit the
scene of the crime'.
What crime though? What happened in late 1996? Well, it's worth noting that
this break-out came just a month before Alan Greenspan's famous 'irrational
exuberance' speech of December 5th, 1996, when he said: "How do we know when
irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values, which then become
subject to unexpected and prolonged contractions as they have in Japan over
the past decade? And how do we factor that assessment into monetary policy?
We as central bankers need not be concerned if a collapsing financial asset
bubble does not threaten to impair the real economy, its production, jobs,
and price stability. Indeed, the sharp stock market break of 1987 had few negative
consequences for the economy."
Despite the warning in that speech, Greenspan did nothing to rein in credit
growth - the credit growth which resulted in the greatest debt bubble of all
time, the consequences of which we are all now suffering. And in fact, that
break-out above the long-term trend-line marked the beginning of the era when
the banks began to outperform the general markets - the era of cheap credit
- an era which ended on February 26th 2007, when the banks began to underperform.
It was the era of monetary irresponsibility. The stock markets have now lost
all the gains that were made.
So that's one reason to expect a bounce - we are at a nice technical level
at which to find a low.
Why else should it come now? Well, bearish sentiment is now overwhelming
and everywhere. It has flooded the mainstream. One example came yesterday when
Max Hastings wrote in the Daily Mail: "The stability and political fabric of
entire societies are imperiled by the meltdown of capitalism's institutions".
Sentiment doesn't get much more bearish than that.
BUY GOLD AND SILVER ONLINE
AT GOLDMONEY
|