|
August 10, 2009 Is "Buy and Hold" Back |
|
|
Hop on board or you'll miss the train When it comes to stocks, buying panics without limit are good and encouraged, while selling panics cause crisis and the threat of systemic collapse. Speculation, which drives Oil prices to stellar heights, is bad, but speculation driving equity prices to unsustainable extremes is good. It is asinine to pick systemic winners and promote their upside into perpetuity and then to enact emergency fascist interventions to save such systems of monopoly when systemically encouraged price bubbles inevitably burst. Perspectives in Trend
Anatomy of a short-term Bullish Stampede We call readers attention to the extremely wide down trend channel, which occurred from October through the March low, which is in direct contrast to the very narrow uptrend channel created from the V-shape intervention led rally. Many suggest the low of March had fully priced in an Armageddon scenario. We suspect the lows printed in March were only part way there. Had it not been for such extraordinary fascist interventions, the Dow would have easily gone on to lose 80% or 90% percent of its value. Having said that, we must now consider to what heights asset price may rise in response to the massive interventionist distortions that have now achieved early signs of success in fostering the desired bullish stampede. The daily chart above also notes the failed bearish head & shoulder pattern (tan down arrow) everyone was clamoring about in late June early July. We also note the much larger bullish head & shoulder pattern (bright green up arrow) which has thus far held well above its neckline breakout to the upside. Unfortunately, for bulls, volume has not confirmed the V-spike from March, and the most recent momentum reading is signaling the possibility of a sell trigger (red down arrow in question). On a somewhat bullish note, the MACD has registered new highs, but threatens a bearish cross from extreme levels of short-term overbought. Our next chart below examines the Dow from the perspective of a weekly price chart dating back to late 2005.
Overhead Band of Resistance not far off Potential Secular Downside Confirmations
Per the monthly perspective above, the tone remains firmly bearish. Here we see the Dow concurrently racing toward its rising mid-channel resistance of what remains of the secular uptrend channel, and toward a falling mid-channel boundary associated with its plausible secular bearish downtrend. For reference, we have also located the horizontal band of resistance from our previous chart. Traversing along path toward SUPERCYCLE IV In our view, a pathway of this general nature is the very best that our trusted shepherds of illusion could possibly hope for. From its onset in 1999, the bearish secular path of SC-IV would include four devastating bear markets, and only three interventionist bull markets. At the end of the SUPERCYCLE, it is assumed and hoped that the misdeeds of our fallen stewards will have been largely corrected, and the market will once again be on path of a more prudential and sustainable course.
So where does this leave us in the interim We cannot stress strongly enough that one size does not fit all - especially when it comes to putting ones hard-earned money to work in the equity indices. Overtime, equity markets inevitably succumb to reality vs. continually rising amid the perpetual hype of never-ending bull markets. That is why in our view, bulls make money, bears make money, and it is why our trusted shepherds of illusion repeatedly slaughter the one size fits all (buy & hold) pigs. Elliott Wave Technology vs. the DOW
We have divided the bar chart above into three categories. From left to right, the first two bars represent the first category, which reflects the Dow's YTD performance (up 4%), and the Dow's performance from 2008 (down 27%). Now that sounds a bit more realistic vs. the mainstream mantra which echoes something like; hurry, hurry, hurry, buy, buy, buy, the Dow is up 45% from the March low, and the new bull market is leaving without you. The middle five bars representing the second category reflect the non-levered ETF performance results delivered via Elliott Wave Technology's premium advisory services amid matching timeframes. In this segment, which contains five performance bars, the total operation of PLATINUM is up 20%, while Levels-I, III, and V are up 25%, 36%, and 18% respectively. Level-II was the only one of our engagement levels that has registered a modest 6% loss from 2008 vs. that of a 27% loss in the Dow itself. The last five performance bars represents the third category reflecting the leveraged performance of futures. In this last and highly leveraged segment, the total operation of PLATINUM is up 91%, while Levels-I, III, and V are up 60%, 145%, and 359% respectively. Level-II was the only one of our levered engagement levels that has registered an underperforming 37% leveraged loss from 2008 vs. that of the actual 27% loss in the Dow itself. As an aside, please do not be seduced by the 359% YTD gains in LEVEL-V, as they were approaching 500% just one month ago. Level-V is highly volatile, and drawdowns can mount as quickly as profits amass. BOTTOM LINE - No Matter where the market goes or when In effort to get as many individuals acquainted with and experience the direct power of PLATINUM, we are in process of developing plans to provide three months of daily access to qualified applicants for less than .75 cents per day. See our closing remarks below and stay tuned for further details. The Complete Speculative Landscape for Equity Index Traders
Elliott Wave Technology's PLATINUM 500 CHALLENGE: Until then, Trade Better / Invest Smarter...
|
|
Joseph Russo
Copyright © 2006-2009 Joseph Russo Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009 SafeHaven.com ADVERTISEMENTS
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money: A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo Maestro, My Ass! -- by Michael Ashton » « Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please visit RSSHelp for instructions. » |