Safehaven | More on the FDIC as a Catalyst...

September 01, 2009

More on the FDIC as a Catalyst...
by Reggie Middleton

In continuing the train of thought initiated in "The FDIC as a catalyst, or the new Doo Doo 32!", I am going to release some interesting data points for subscribers and non-paying readers alike.

The FDIC imposed a special assessment charge on all FDIC insured depository institutions in 2Q09- which amounted to 5 basis points of bank's total assets less tier 1 capital. However, the charge was capped at 10 basis points of the bank's domestic deposits. FDIC has indicated they will levy a similar charge (in terms of formula) in third or fourth quarter of 2009. This helps serve as a catalyst for those who have been short failing banks, just to see their share price double or more. You see, it seems that the FDIC is one of the few government arms that is actually working solely for the benefit of the individual tax payer and not exhibiting unnecessary favoritism towards the banking industry. Examples of such are rampant:

The Treasury with their stress tests, lacking any form of realistic stress:

The FASB allowing politicians and special interest groups tell them how to perform accounting, to the beneficial interest of the banking lobby, of course: see: The Folly of US Financial Poitical Games.

The Fed and thier "shroud of secrecy to prevent unfounded rumors from being created from founded facts", see The Fed Believes Secrecy is in Our Best Interests. Here are Some of the Secrets.

For more on this in the MSM, see Bloomberg: FDIC May Add to Special Fees as Mounting Failures Drain Reserve:

Aug. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Colonial BancGroup Inc.'s collapse and the prospect of mounting failures among regional lenders may prompt the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to impose a special fee as soon as next month to boost reserves by $5.6 billion.

The FDIC board might act sooner than expected after the Aug. 14 failure of Alabama-based Colonial cost the agency's insurance fund $2.8 billion, and as banks such as Chicago-based Corus Bankshares Inc. report dwindling capital and Guaranty Financial Group Inc. of Austin, Texas, says it may fail. The fund fell to the lowest level since 1992 in the first quarter.

"With the failure of Colonial Bank and the possible near- term failures of one or two more large banks, the FDIC may be forced to levy a special assessment on the industry sooner than it had planned," said Camden Fine, president of the Independent Community Bankers of America, an industry group.

Thefailure of 77 banks this year is draining the fund, prompting the agency in May to set an emergency fee of 5 cents for every $100 of assets, excluding Tier 1 capital, to raise $5.6 billion in the second quarter. The agency has authority to set fees in the third and fourth quarters, if needed, to prevent a decline in the fund from undermining public confidence.

The FDIC board has until Sept. 30 to adopt a fee that banks would set aside in the third quarter. The agency has already signaled another special fee this year.

"We will likely have to have another special assessment in the fourth quarter," FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair said in an Aug. 5 Bloomberg Television interview.

Two additional assessments this year are "very possible" amid the rising cost of failures, Chip MacDonald, a partner specializing in financial services at law firm Jones Day, said in a telephone interview.

'Painful For Industry'
...
The fund had $13 billion on March 31, the lowest since 1992 when it was $178.4 million, the FDIC said. The 56 bank collapses since March 31 cost an estimated $16 billion. First-quarter failures cost the fund $2.2 billion, the agency said.

The agency is required by law to shore up the fund when the reserve ratio, or balance divided by insured deposits, falls below 1.15 percent. It was at 0.27 percent as of March 31.

The industry will pay $17 billion in premiums this year, including $11.6 billion from the annual fee, said Robert Strand, a senior economist at the American Bankers Association, said in a telephone interview.

'Great Expense'

"This is not a good time for the industry to pay an additional special assessment," Strand said. "This is a great expense while banks are trying to recapitalize and make loans."

If the fund is drained, the FDIC also has the option of tapping a line of credit at the Treasury Department that Congress extended in May to $100 billion, with temporary borrowing authority of $500 billion through 2010.

Separately, a proposal Bair made last month to charge banks additional fees tied to risks when their business expands beyond traditional lending, such as proprietary trading, hasn't advanced during Congress's recess. A fund created with the fees would cover losses when a large firm collapses, avoiding government bailouts of companies deemed too big to fail.

"Those institutions that have been the riskiest and have engaged in the riskiest behavior should be assessed," House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank said in a July 23 interview with Bloomberg Television. More on this and how it will affect stalwarts JPM and GS later.

How can I monetize this? Well, there are members of the new Doo Doo list that will be getting hit hare, and rightfully so. See below...

Subscriber short candidate 1 - this company is trading at what we feel to be an unsustainable and unrealistic valuation from what we have uncovered thus far and has a share price of $15 which makes it a potential actionable short for my portfolio. It also has options available, and we have initiated coverage on it: - In 2Q09, it recorded a FDIC special assessment charge of $5.5 million (0.5% of the tangible equity as of June 30, 2009).The amount is about 13.1% of total revenues (net interest income after provisions) in 2Q09 and 32% of pretax income before special assessment charge. Based on the total assets and tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, we arrive at the same figure. If FDIC imposes another special assessment charge for 3Q09, the bank is likely to record an approx. equal charge in 3Q09. Look for a summary preview to be released to subscribers within 24 hours.

SunTrust banks - This original Doo Doo 32 list member from early last year (Sun Trust Bank Report 2008-08-30 06:39:22 391.89 Kb - Sun Trust Bank Stress Test Scenario Analysis - Government Simulation 2009-04-30 03:43:18 665.82 Kb - Sun Trust Banks Simulated Government Stress Test 2009-05-05 11:37:13 1016.17 Kb) states that although the banks are clearly not out of the woods yet, they are clearly positioned to do well in comparison to their peers (see Most US Stocks Drop as SunTrust CEO Predicts More Bank Losses). I disagree. In 2Q09, STI recorded a FDIC special assessment charge of $78.2 million (0.7% of the tangible equity as of June 30, 2009) and the same shall be paid on September 30, 2009. The amount is about 6.5% of total revenues (net interest income after provisions and non interest income) in 2Q09. Based on the total assets and tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, we arrive at special assessment charge of about $79 million. If FDIC imposes another special assessment charge for 3Q09, the bank is likely to record an approx. equal charge in 3Q09.

I will post an update on the SunTrust metrics for subscribers by tomorrow morning.

Reggie Middleton
Reggie Middleton, LLC
Perpetual Interests, LLCTM
http://boombustblog.com/

Who am I?

Well, I fancy myself the personification of the free thinking maverick, the ultimate non-conformist as it applies to investment and analysis. I am definitively outside the box - not your typical or stereotypical Wall Street investor. I work out of my home, not a Manhattan office. I build my own technology and perform my own research - in lieu of buying it or following the crowd. I create and follow my own macro strategies and am by definition, a contrarian to the nth degree.

Since I use my research as a tool for my own investing to actually put food on my table, I can stand behind it as doing what it is supposed too - educate, illustrate and elucidate. I do not sell advice, I am not a reporter hence do not sell stories, and I do not sell research. I am an entrepreneur who exists just outside of mainstream corporate America and Wall Street. This allows me freedom to do things that many can not. For instance, I pride myself on developing some of the highest quality research available, regardless of price. No conflicts of interest, no corporate politics, no special favors. Just the hard truth as I have found it - and believe me, my team and I do find it! I welcome any and all to peruse my blog, use my custom hacked collaborative social tools, read the articles, download the files, and make a critical comparison of the opinion referencing the situation at hand and the time stamp on the blog post to the reality both at the time of the post and the present. Hopefully, you will be as impressed with the Boom Bust as I am and our constituency.

I pay for significant information and data, and am well aware of the value of quality research. I find most currently available research lacking, in both quality and quantity. The reason why I had to create my own research staff was due to my dissatisfaction with what was currently available - to both individuals and institutions.

So here I am, creating my own research for my own investment activity. What really sets my actions apart is that I offer much of what I produce to the public without charge - free to distribute and redistribute, as long as it is left unaltered and full attribution is given to the author and owner. Why would I do such a thing when others easily charge 5 and 6 digits annually for what some may consider a lesser product? It is akin to open source analysis! My ideas and implementations are actually improved and fine tuned when bounced off of the collective intellect of the many, in lieu of that of the few - no matter how smart those few may believe themselves to be.

Very recently, I have started charging for the forensics portion of my work, which has freed up the resources to develop the site to deliver even more research for free, particularly on the global macro and opinion front. This move has allowed me to serve an more diverse constituency, which now includes the institutional consumer (ie., investment turned consumer banks, hedge funds, pensions, etc,) as well as the newbie individual investor who is just getting started - basically the two polar opposites of the investing spectrum. I am proud to announce major banks as paying clients, and brand new investors who take my book recommendations and opinions on true wealth and success to heart.

So, this is how I use my background and knowledge in new media, distributed computing, risk management, insurance, financial engineering, real estate, corporate valuation and financial analysis to pursue, analyze and capitalize on global macroeconomic opportunities. I have included a more in depth bio at the bottom of the page for those who really, really need to know more about me.

Visit his blog Boom Bust Blog.