|
So far in September, blood has been gushing in great torrents from many major
commodities. As of this past Tuesday, gold had bled 6.0%, silver 14.1%, and
crude oil 9.3% in just the first seven trading days in this month alone. Naturally
with prices spiraling relentlessly lower, commodities sentiment fell off a
cliff and cratered.
During my work days I always have CNBC on in my office, usually muted so I
can concentrate on my research and writing. I do have closed captioning enabled
though so text of what is spoken floats across the screen. If I happen to look
up and a discussion on commodities is taking place, I usually unmute the TV
to see what the analysts have to say. CNBC interviews considered in aggregate
offer a good read on prevailing sentiment.
Some of the things I heard on CNBC this week were amazing, reflecting absolutely horrendous commodities
sentiment. I lost count of the number of analysts who claimed that the "commodities
bubble" is over and we are entering the bust phase. One gentleman who was interviewed
compared the commodities stocks earlier this year to the NASDAQ mania in March
2000, implying commodities stocks are going to plunge.
A prominent CNBC host repeatedly made the assertion that this commodities
bull was sparked by the September 11th terrorist attacks. Another fellow said
that since the CRB Index broke its uptrend, the commodities bull has officially
ended. These assertions are just plain silly, of course, but the mere fact
they were airing en masse reflects just how damaged commodities sentiment has
become due to the recent sharp corrections. They are easy to refute.
Bubbles and manias only happen when the general public becomes utterly
captivated and sold over to a specific asset class so it is all they talk about
and buy. There is no way this has happened in commodities yet. Until you can
go to the grocery store and overhear random conversations about gold stocks
while standing in line, until you can go to a cocktail party where the only
thing everyone talks about is their junior mining stocks, there is no popular
mania. And no popular mania means no bubble, period.
Commodities stocks today reflect the utter lack of a mania as well, highlighting
the gross inanity of such a thesis. In June 2000, a few months after the
NASDAQ top, the elite NASDAQ 100 stocks sported an average P/E ratio of 124.1x
earnings! This week the XOI oil-stock index had an average P/E of merely 8.5x
earnings. While 100x+ earnings is absolutely a mania, less than 10x is still
a bear market. There has been no general commodities-stock mania, because with
the exception of precious-metals stocks commodities-stock valuations have remained
extremely depressed and undervalued for their entire bull.
And 9/11 sparking this commodities bull? Such an assertion is so ridiculously
wrong it is laughable! In oil's case, it bottomed in late
1998 years before 9/11. And if anything the economic disruptions
caused by the government-induced hysteria and draconian air-travel restrictions
post-9/11 hurt the oil market by reducing demand. Commodities are in secular
bulls because their individual demand-growth profiles are outpacing their supply-growth
profiles worldwide. 9/11 it totally irrelevant to this bull.
While these initial arguments I heard many times on CNBC this week are silly,
the fact that the CRB has broken its uptrend is very true and worth
considering. Since early 2002, the venerable CRB commodities index has never
spent more than a few days at a time under its 200-day moving average or below
support. But over the last couple weeks the intense selling pressure has driven
it down deep under both its 200dma and support for the first time. This
technical weakness is indeed unprecedented within this commodities bull.
While the CRB has no doubt broken down technically, I suspect most folks are
forgetting that today's CRB is not directly comparable to the CRB before July
2005. Last July the CRB was revised for
the 10th time in its long and illustrious lifespan. Where oil comprised about
6% and energy less than 18% of the 9th CRB revision prior to last July, now
oil and energy utterly dominate this index.
Over the last 14 months or so since this 10th revision, oil alone now accounts
for 23% of the CRB index and energy in aggregate a whopping 39%! Today energy dominates the
CRB. Not only does this render it not strictly comparable with its pre-July-2005
history, but it means that any sharp CRB moves are likely going to be sparked
by underlying energy moves. As goes energy, so goes this latest energy-heavy
CRB iteration.
Therefore if we can understand what is going on in energy, particularly oil
which is weighted almost 4x heavier than any other CRB component, then we can
better understand the CRB's recent downside breakout. Due to this fact, as
well as the open positions we have today in various energy stock and options
trades, I am taking a look at the recent oil correction in this essay.
Oil is not only the key to the CRB, but since it is such a high-profile commodity
it is the key to the entire commodities bull in the minds of many mainstream
investors. If oil is really in trouble then the carnage in the CRB could just
be starting, which could very well spawn more sympathetic selling in other
commodities. But if oil looks fine technically, then all the gloom and doom
choking the commodities markets today is just a temporary blip creating an
awesome buying opportunity.
Whenever markets move fast and get scary, I find the best way to force myself
to view them rationally is to look at their latest move in strategic context.
While it certainly feels like the bottom has fallen out of oil in the last
month or so, when this latest oil correction is viewed within the context of
this oil bull to date it is neither the largest nor fastest. In fact, at least
at this stage it is rather unremarkable in most aspects.
My first chart looks at major corrections in this oil bull back to 2004, a
period of time which encompasses the lion's share of the bull-to-date gains
and volatility. Each major oil correction is numbered and labeled with the
absolute correction decline, the number of trading days it took, and the average
loss per day over the correction's lifespan.
In order to define a major correction, I considered it any sharp slide in
oil prices that happened right after a major upleg or rally that carried oil
well above its 200-day moving average. In addition the subsequent slide had
to drag oil back down near or below its 200dma to make major-correction status.
Anything that fell short of this definition was just considered a pullback
and is not analyzed, with the single exception of a recent mid-2006 minor oil
pullback that is discussed later.
At several of its major interim highs, oil carved double tops in close proximity.
In order to calculate these corrections, I always went off the second top of
a double interim top even if it was slightly lower than the first top. This
approach makes the correction metrics more comparable since it excludes the
time between the double interim tops when oil was essentially just consolidating
and not yet correcting.

In our latest major oil correction that feels so wickedly devastating in real
time, the king of commodities has plunged 17.2% so far in just 25 trading days,
or an average daily decline of 0.7% over this period of time. If your only
source of oil insight was CNBC interviews, I am sure you would think that oil
is heading to $40 and our bull is over. But somewhat amazingly given how horrible
oil sentiment is today, this latest correction is merely average!
There were five major corrections before this one over the past several years,
numbered 1 through 5 above. They averaged absolute declines of 18.5% over an
average span of 33 trading days and yielded an average downslope of 0.64% per
day. These average stats are very close to and actually slightly worse than
our latest major correction of 17.2% over 25 trading days yielding a 0.69%
per day downslope. Carefully consider this.
Sentiment in oil and oil stocks has been outrageously bad, I have never seen
so much talk of the end of the oil bull as during this past week. Yet the major
correction that spawned this terrible sentiment was merely average at
best, really weaker than the average correction that preceded it in terms of
absolute decline and duration! What feels excruciating in isolation often feels
merely unpleasant when considered in context.
When you realize that there have already been corrections in this oil bull
that were much deeper than our latest one, others that lasted longer, and others
still with steeper downslopes, it is hard to get excited about the relatively
mild oil slide since early August. In a pure technical sense relative to bull-to-date
precedent, our latest correction was totally unremarkable and not extreme in
any way.
If so, then why did this correction spawn so much negativity? I suspect a
few factors have contributed to the perception that this correction is different
in some way and hence more threatening.
First, most analysts are like most mainstream investors and they don't consider
recent developments within their bull-to-date context. Since we haven't seen
a sharp decline in the oil price since February, I suspect many analysts have
conveniently forgotten just how volatile oil can be on the downside too. Without
a knowledge of market history that is only attained by being a diligent student
of the markets, it is easy to get swept up in current events.
Second, this latest oil decline flies in the face of oil
seasonals, which are usually quite strong this time of year. A sharp
oil decline in a month where it is statistically improbable is more likely
to spawn fear than a sharp decline in a less favorable month. I suspect oil's
usual seasonal strength failed due to the lack of a catalyst. Without any
geopolitical fires raging or any hurricanes swirling into the Gulf of Mexico,
speculators had little proximate motivation to continue bidding up oil. In
the absence of buying interest prices tend to fall.
But an interesting disconnect has emerged. Wall Street has been advancing
the theory that there is a massive speculative premium in oil, that it is trading
tens of dollars higher than it should be due to speculators gaming chaos in
the Middle East. I don't think this theory makes much sense though. The Middle
East has been a cauldron of strife for centuries, wars are nothing new in this
region. On top of this, oil has been advancing since 1998. Relative to the past
60 years of Middle East geopolitical turmoil, the last 8 during this oil
bull have really been fairly calm.
Purely speculative markets tend to rocket parabolic, like the NASDAQ in 1999
and early 2000. But as the chart above clearly shows, this oil bull has been
advancing slowly and conservatively, moving up at a moderate pace without any
parabolic spikes. When a market rises moderately for years and years paralleling
its 200dma, it is a sign of changing fundamentals, not speculative fervor.
This oil bull exists because world oil demand is growing faster than world
oil supplies, and oil's moderate and long-term secular uptrend reflects this.
As Asia and the rest of the world aspire to Western standards of living, per-capita
oil consumption is relentlessly rising worldwide. This is putting tremendous
strain on existing oil capacity. Since it takes so long to find and produce
oil, it will probably take another decade or more to rectify this core fundamental
imbalance.
Fundamentals take years to change at best. It is inconceivable that
the world oil market changed fundamentally since the latest 17% slump in oil
started a little over a month ago. If fundamentals cannot change that fast
then they still remain very bullish. So the recent correction based on speculators
getting worried about a geopolitical/hurricane lull is a psychology-driven
technical event. And such countertrend moves rarely last for long since sentiment
changes so rapidly.
Oil has already experienced many sharp countertrend corrections as the chart
above reveals. But none of these corrections altered the core bullish fundamentals
underlying global supply and demand. Near interim tops traders get overly focused
on the short term, they get scared, and they start selling. But a month or
two later near the interim bottoms rationality returns and once again the spotlight
shines its focus on the long-term fundamentals rather than short-term potentially
bearish concerns.
If oil's fundamentals haven't changed during the latest sharp correction,
then odds are today's low prices will prove to be a great buying opportunity.
Oil has been temporarily driven below both its support and crucial 200-day
moving average. If you carefully examine the chart above, every other time
this has happened in the last several years oil rallied sharply not long after.
Such sentiment-driven technical breakdowns seldom last for long in fundamentally-driven
secular bulls.
Per Relativity trading
theory, the best time to add long positions within a secular bull is when a
price temporarily retreats to or under its 200dma following a major correction.
Interestingly fear in oil has been so rampant over the past week that it has
driven crude to its lowest level relative to its 200dma in years. At its worst
close this week, rOil managed to fall to 0.944x. Such dismal lows will probably
prove to mark an exceptionally good bull-market buying opportunity.
With oil technicals considered within their bull-to-date context not all that
bad, and oil's latest sharp correction merely sentiment-driven and unlikely
to last within a strong fundamental bull, today's interim oil lows should have
big implications for oil stocks. The vast majority of investors and speculators
are not directly involved in the futures market so they get their oil exposure
by proxy, via owning elite oil producers.
At Zeal we buy and recommend outstanding oil stocks and call options on oil
stocks whenever oil gets this beaten down, and we did so again this week in
Zeal Speculator. But we also had existing positions deployed from last summer
the last time the XOI was very weak. Like everyone else long energy stocks,
we have been hammered in the past couple weeks. With extensive energy stock
exposure on the long side, I was curious to see how the XOI has reacted to
oil's major corrections. This next chart takes a look.
The exact major oil corrections rendered above are here superimposed on top
of the flagship XOI oil-stock index. Sometimes, especially lately, the XOI
corrects directly in sympathy with oil. Since the dates used to demarcate these
corrections are oil's and not the XOI's, the percentage moves do not fully
reflect actual XOI interim highs and lows. It is interesting though to see
what the XOI has done while oil was correcting in recent years.
Between corrections 5 and 6 for oil, it had a modest pullback and consolidation
last spring well above its 200dma that is apparent in the chart above. The
reason I analyzed this particular oil pullback is because over this same period
of time the XOI had a major correction that is evident below. This steep
XOI correction in sympathy with this oil pullback bottomed this past June and
drove the XOI to its lowest levels relative to its 200dma of this entire bull.

As more and more investors and speculators discover the vast potential in
oil stocks, the XOI has become more responsive to oil prices in the last couple
years. Back in 2004 during the first two major oil corrections, the XOI was
more or less flat. It didn't really start following oil lower until oil's third
major correction in 2005. This newfound affinity was to be short-lived though.
Late last August as hurricane Katrina finished plowing through the Gulf of
Mexico and hit New Orleans, crude oil peaked just under $70 in a dazzling new
bull-to-date high. But the day after Katrina made landfall oil crested and
entered its fourth major correction. As you probably remember though, at the
time there was not a lot known about how damaged oil infrastructure was out
in the Gulf and along the coast. So oil stocks were immediately bid higher
and rallied dramatically through the first half of oil's fourth major correction.
While they eventually plunged and followed oil's lead, the hurricane-driven
XOI surge early on in oil's fourth correction is probably just an anomaly.
Since then, over the past year or so, the XOI has very much followed the fortunes
of oil. Especially when oil is weak, the XOI really tends to fall in sympathy.
This is readily apparent in the fifth and sixth major oil corrections above,
as well as during the oil pullback between these two corrections.
Now for those of you long oil stocks and options like I am, it is encouraging
to look at the past year's major XOI interim lows relative to oil's. Note that
after oil hit its own major interim lows, marked by the blue arrowheads pointing
up, the XOI started consolidating and rising immediately after. And within
weeks of these oil lows, the XOI was rocketing skywards yet again. The XOI
doesn't tend to linger at lows once oil starts recovering.
If the XOI continues this behavior this time around, and oil is indeed near
its latest major interim low today, then oil stocks ought to thrive in the
coming months. Another spectacular rally such as the one we saw in late June
is certainly possible. Like today, back then the XOI fell under its support
and 200dma and worried a lot of people. But soon after this plunge, the XOI
began to rally sharply in a magnificent winning
streak. By late July, only about six weeks after its dismal oil-driven
lows, the XOI had achieved awesome new bull-to-date highs.
Interestingly back at those mid-June lows the rXOI hit its lowest levels of
this entire bull to date. But just this week fear in the oil-stock sector rose
to such staggering levels on the oil weakness that the XOI almost fell
as low relative to its 200dma again as it was back in June. Since the June
reaction rally off such ridiculously oversold lows was explosive, we may have
the potential to see another explosive XOI rally off of similarly oversold
conditions very soon.
At Zeal we are always watching for hyper-oversold conditions where short-term
fear temporarily overshadows long-term fundamentals. We then try to add long
positions during these very times when most traders are scared, the best time
to buy from a contrarian standpoint. This week we added new positions in Zeal
Speculator since oil and the XOI looked too oversold to pass up. The time
to buy is when most other folks are selling and everyone thinks going long
is suicidal.
If you are interested in following our time-tested contrarian trading approach
across major commodities sectors, you would like our acclaimed monthly Zeal
Intelligence newsletter. In it we are constantly analyzing, relentlessly
evaluating, and always looking for stellar trading opportunities in elite commodities
stocks. When technical conditions look highly promising such as in oil and
oil stocks today, we recommend new trades. Countless opportunities will arise
as this commodities bull marches on, so please
subscribe today so you don't miss them.
The bottom line is nothing has changed fundamentally in the global oil markets
in just a month. The sharp selloff in oil is merely a psychological response
driven by fear-laden sentiment. Wall Street has convinced many speculators
that oil fundamentals don't matter and only crises drive oil. While not true,
the lull in geopolitical and storm events in this past month has played into
this prevailing mindset anyway and sparked selling.
Oil stocks have plunged in sympathy with oil, hammering those on the long
side including us. Nevertheless, the technicals for both oil and the XOI considered
in context show neither correction to be remarkable. They are both just average.
And very soon after such corrections mature, oil and the XOI tend to start
powering higher again in short order.
|