|
by Doug Wakefield with Ben Hill
Last weekend, my wife and I went over to a friend's home to watch "The Pursuit
of Happyness," starring Will Smith. During the opening scenes of the movie,
Smith's character sits in despair thinking about his own struggles in medical
sales, during the recession of 1981, while the television blares in the background
with the voice of President Reagan discussing the financial plight of our nation.
In this snippet, we hear Reagan talk about the urgent need for our national
leaders to face the $50 billion deficit. And like the swell of the bull market
of the 80s and 90s, the movie goes on, drowning out Reagan's words and numbers.
Recently we posted a document to our website developed by David Walker, Comptroller
General of the United States. The title: Fiscal
Stewardship - A Critical Challenge Facing Our Nation. Walker opens,
"The federal government's financial condition and fiscal outlook are worse
than many may understand. Despite an increase in revenues in fiscal year
2006 of about $255 billion, the federal government reported that it costs
exceeded its revenues by $450 billion (i.e., net operating cost) and that
its cash outlays exceeded its cash receipts by $248 billion (i.e., unified
budget deficit). Further, as of September 30, 2006, the U.S. government reported
that it owed (i.e., liabilities) more than it owned (i.e., assets) by almost
$9 trillion. In addition, the present value of the government's major reported
long-term 'fiscal exposures' - liabilities (e.g., debt), contingencies (e.g.,
insurance) and social insurance and other commitments and promises (e.g.,
Social Security, Medicare) - rose from $20 trillion to about $50 trillion
in the last 6 years." (Parenthesis his)
So, we have seen large numbers grow astronomically larger, and as a society,
we have learned to ignore the naysayers, who do not hold to our optimistic
view of the financial markets. Not only does this happen in the investing public,
but it also occurs at the very top of academia, in the writings of the Federal
Reserve. In the July/August 2006 edition of the Federal Reserve Bank of St.
Louis Review, the question "Is the United States Bankrupt?" was raised. The
Editor's Introduction to the article states that Laurence Kotlikoff, coauthor
of the book, The Coming Generational Storm, "believes the question question
of the bankruptcy of the U.S. government is not only worthy of serious discussion,
but that the answer to the question is clearly 'yes.'" Lest we, who've not
been schooled in the complexities of economic and monetary policy, look at
Walker's numbers and jump too quickly to side with Kotlikoff, we are quickly
reminded that:
"The government's assets certainly are not in the process of being forcibly
liquidated by creditors. For that matter, the notion of a formal bankruptcy
process mediated by an outside party appears unrealistic, as well. After
all, the vast majority of U.S. government's liabilities to foreigners are
denominated in U.S. dollars, which can be supplied virtually at will." (Italics
Mine) 1
There you have it folks. David Walker and Laurence Kotlikoff are just getting
people overly-concerned about our country's ever-mounting debt for no real
reason. After all, as long as the guys and gals at the Federal Reserve have
the "dollars supplied at will" machine, what could possibly go wrong?


The sad reality depicted by the graphs above, is that the two men at the Federal
Reserve, who wrote the Editor's Introduction for this piece, apparently represent
the thoughts of many in government today. While there are some who have the
courage to speak out against the travesty of our nation's finances, most are
a yes men, clinging to their jobs, and the average American has lost his or
her bearings. We accept as normal that a new car that used to cost $3,000 now
costs $30,000, or that a home that used to cost $40,000 now costs $200,000.
The fact is that throughout our lifetime, the costs of stamps, milk, health
care, auto repairs, and virtually anything else that we consider basic to the
American way of life, has been propelled higher by this "dollars supplied at
will" machine.
According to John Williams, Shadow Government
Statistics, in July
2005, the money supply (M3) for the U.S. was growing at 5.19 percent,
and, as of March 2007, it's increasing at 11.65 percent. So, why do our nation's
leaders hold Senate
hearings in order to tighten lending standards, because of the reckless
subprime mortgage industry, and at the same time, do nothing about the doubling
of the pace of new debt, which wreaks havoc on our entire financial system?
This calls us to look lower than the branches of subprime mortgages, unfunded
pensions, back-dated stock options, and phantom shares of stock that are
borrowed in real transactions. At the root, we must realize we have used
false layers of complexity to mask outright fraud.
Murray Rothbard was known for his clear thinking, and in the years ahead,
many will come to regret not having heeded his words.
"So: if the chronic inflation undergone
by Americans, and in almost every other country, is caused by the continuing
creation of new money, and if in each country its governmental "central
bank" (in the United States, the Federal Reserve) is the sole monopoly source
and creator of all money, who then is responsible for the blight
of inflation? Who except the very institution that is solely empowered to
create money, that is, the Fed (and the Bank of England, and the Bank of
Italy, and other central banks) itself?" (Italics and parenthesis,
his) (Page 11) 2
So as we listen to the demagoguery and divide up and declare our allegiances
to individuals, institutions, businesses, churches, synagogues, and political
parties, we should remember these words from Henry Bretton's book, The Power
of Money:
"Terms like public or private, central or dispersed, liberal or conservative,
right-wing, left-wing, or center, tend to obscure the central issue: money
is power, and those in control of the strategic command center in the system
can use that power to their advantage." [Page 152-Power of Money] 3
As "The Pursuit of Happyness" comes to an end, Chris
Gardner, Will Smith's character in the movie, celebrates finally being
the one broker chosen from the grueling program at Dean Witter. In the epilogue,
we learn that in 2006, Gardner sold a minority interest in his company for
millions.
As inspiring as the story is, it took place over a 25-year period when to
Dow went up 12-fold from just under 1000, in 1981. The reality is that this
period also saw the greatest destruction of our currency and the largest rise
of debt in our nation's history. The next story is just not one that any of
us would want to write or read. Debt will decline, prices will contract, and
reality will set in. Inspirational stories will still be there, but they will
not likely be of the rags to riches variety.
At one part in the film, Gardner states to a prospective client, who is interested
in increasing his yield while lowering his taxes, "So basically, you don't
want nobody's hands in your pockets but your own." Yet, inflation has taken
more money from us than even the most exorbitant taxes. For those who doubt
the destructive power of this process, consider Keynes' words in his book, The
Economic Consequences of Peace:
"Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist
System was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation,
governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of
the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but
they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many,
it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches
strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing
distribution of wealth. Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond
their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become 'profiteers,'
who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism
has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds
and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month,
all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate
foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless;
and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.
Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning
the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages
all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does
it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose." (Italics
his) (235-236) 4
How well these words describe our current juncture is truly a shame. Today,
our greatest obstacle is that we do not understand history because we do not
understand financial history, and until we understand the role that fiat currency
has played, and the power of money, our interpretation of history will be skewed
because we are missing a critical component to all of our lives - money. If
we are like most, we feel insulted by this proposition, yet for lack of time
or desire, we will not read to see if this is true.
In our society, "happyness" is synonymous with financial prosperity, so much
so that many fail to see the true strength of Gardner was not found in his
ultimate financial success. Rather, the enormous courage that Gardner displayed
was in taking each day as it came, in his tenacity to daily move past his own
pain, anger and frustration with his current circumstances, and in his resolve
to never stop making decisions in his attempt to move forward, and in doing
his best to provide for and protect his son.
As I reflect on the enormous sorrow of those trying to regroup from the brutal
attack at Virginia Tech on April 16th, I am inspired by the actions of Liviu
Librescu. Here was a man who had lived through the Holocaust and a brutal communist
regime in Romania during the Cold War. He had spent the last 2 decades of his
life as a college professor in a quiet idyllic campus, and may have attained
little financially in his life. Yet, he blocked a door, holding it shut, paying
the ultimate price to protect his students. The trait that we admire in Gardner
and Librescu is called self-sacrifice. Truly, "Greater love has no one than
this, that he lay down his life for his friends."
If we are going to get past this next chapter in our nation's story, our leaders
will have to be willing to place painful truths before individuals who are
reluctant to accept such realities. They must be willing to place others' lives
above their own.
Sources:
1 Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, July-August 2006, Editor's Introduction,
William R. Emmons and Anthony N.M. Pennington-Cross, pg 222
2 The
Case Against the Fed (1994) Dr. Murray N. Rothbard, pg 11
3 The
Power of Money: A Political-Economic Analysis with Special Emphasis on the
American Political System(1980) Professor Henry L. Bretton, pg 152
4 The
Economic Consequences of Peace (1920) John Maynard Keynes, pg 235, 236
Since January 2006, Best Minds Inc has developed 15 lessons to date, through
our monthly newsletter, The Investors Mind: Anticipating Trends through
the Lens of History, with the intent of clarifying and strengthening the
thinking of investors and those in positions of leadership. If you are interested
in an overview of the15 lessons that we have presented to our subscribers, click
here. We continue to gain recognition for our industry paper on short selling, Riders
on the Storm: Short Selling in Contrary Winds. The research paper can be
obtained with a subscription to The Investor's Mind. To learn more about
our mission, as well as our educational and advisory services, visit our website.
|