|
Indications from authoritative sources tell us that it is unlikely that "Official" gold sales, after September 2004, will take place unless the Washington or Central
Bank Gold Agreement, is renewed!
The same sources have led us to believe that the Agreement will be renewed
and at possibly a higher tonnage than before, around 500 tonnes, with the sole
purpose of allowing the gold price to rise in an orderly manner, for even 500
tonnes will not keep the gold price down.
This direction was indicated by the sale of 90 tonnes gold by Portugal of
late, which drew relatively little attention from the media, much to our surprise.
More coverage was deserved, particularly as the market is moving rapidly out
of balance, at present levels, towards a shortage. The developing shortage
and potentially explosive price rise has been highlighted by the continuing
aggressive de-hedging process which can no longer be explained by the loss
of financial incentive in hedging [low contango levels]. Yes, that would explain
why hedging is not continuing, butnot the present process of de-hedging.
Shareholder pressures, alongside the belief by most gold producers, that we
are in a multi year "Bull" market, have, no doubt precipitated their
actions, which continue vigorously at this moment.
The Washington Agreement is working well and achieving its purpose, precipitating
a market situation where the gold price has to rise. It is time to understand
this purpose and the effect it is about to have now and in the future.
Gold-Authentic Money has, since its inception, highlighted the role of the
Washington Agreement [now referred to as the Central Bank Gold Agreement] as
being far more than simply giving transparency to Central Bank present and
future dealings. In reality the Agreement placed aceiling on their sales
with the full intention of precipitating a turn around in the Gold price from
a falling one to a rising one. Indeed, it is now becoming very clear that they
wished and wish, to see anorderly rise in the price of gold, so that
its "rehabilitation" as a monetary asset is credible, acceptable
and we believe, necessary.
The market is now seeing confirmation of this intention. Right now, the Washington
Agreement is serving toprevent "Official" supplies
reaching the market,above the 400 tonnes agreed on in the Agreement.
With around 280 tonnes of "Official" gold already sold in the year
September 2002 to September 2003, the gold market has demonstrated a voracious
appetite for gold, well in excess of the 120 tonnes remaining from "Official" supplies,
coming to the market in the next 5 months.
Is the intention of the key Central Bankers towards gold an almost avuncular
management of the Gold price, protecting the institutions and structures in
the market? The danger is that the price will rise significantly out of their
control.
It was reported by the Central Bank of Portugal that it had sold a total of
90 tonnes of Gold since later 2002.45 tonnes of gold was sold in March
and April, which followed on from15 tonnes sold in late 2002, and30
tonnes sold in February, taking the total to90 tonnes in recent
months. At first, some reported that these were renegade sales of gold by Portugal
outside the Washington Agreement, so collapsing its credibility. However, to
the contrary, it was clear thatthese were part of the arrangements made
in advance of the September 1999 signing of the Agreement, and were included
in the budgeted sales.
This brings home to all, that prior to the signing of the Agreement all previously
arranged saleswere declared to the signatories. Based on this schedule,
the figure of 400 tonnes gold sales a year was agreed and co-ordinated. Tacit
agreement was indicated by the B.I.S. and the Federal Reserve, thus accounting
for all the key Central Banks, world wide.No further sales were to take
place other than these sales, during the next five years, after which a
review of the situation would take place!
No doubt such a review would be to make any adjustments necessary to see
that its purpose was achieved and would continue!
The assumption by some that this level of new sales was determined only at
the W.A. was, therefore, wrong. Nonew sales were formulated. It is vital,
in order to understand this Agreement that this agreementcurbed further
sales.When looking forward to the next Agreement it is important to
appreciate this underlying principle.
The current situation regarding "Official" gold sales, taking into
account the33tonnessold by the Dutch, and the intention of the Swiss
to sell a total of283t [120 tonnes remaining] this year (Sept-Sept),the
full quota of 400tonnes per annum is now, publicly, fully accounted for!
The Portuguese sales are believed to be related to options structures entered
into prior to signing the Accord in 1999. It would appear that this is not
the end of a series of sales by Portugal These sales show, with the bankruptcy
of one of their gold debtors, that Portugal could not possibly be happy with
its policy of lending gold or providing options on their reserves of gold.
Such market activities are not appropriate for a guardian of a nations savings.
The example this provided to other Central Bankers hopefully has scotched any
intention of following that path. The head of the Portuguese Central Bank,
no doubt has had more than a few very sweaty moments as he explained these
sales to a government suffering from a sense of humour failure. Thankfully
for him they were at high market prices, but not nearly as high as could be
achieved in the future, we believe. Mr Gordon Brown, the mastermind behind
the sales of the bulk of Britain's gold, well below $300 an ounce, survived
his humiliation from his act of dubious accomplishment, with a politicians
bravado devoid of good sense. Few Central Bankers remain, who don't twitch
at the thought of emulating these men.
It is expected that the remaining supply from the W.A. quota for this year
until September is being sold at the rate of just over 6 tonnes a week from
Switzerland, as part of the 1300 tonnes sale it arranged before signing the
Agreement. However, it is suspected that Portugal has not finished announcing
the sales previously arranged, so Switzerland may well have to interrupt this
sale programme to comply with the Agreement, as sales from any other source
will have to beat the expense of Swiss sales. The balance of the Swiss
sales will then have to be postponed until after Sept 2004.
The signatories of the W.A. know precisely from whom this balance of this
year's tonnage will come, as they do next years sales. Any postponement of
Swiss sales cannot be added to next years sales as this quota is already scheduled
up to 400 tonnes.No more sales can be used to exert any downward pressure
on the price, from Central Banks, unless at the expense of eliminating
further sales up to September 2003. However, it can be part of post-September
2004 sales. No statements have been issued by the W.A. signatories as to arrangements
post Sept 2004 and so gives rise to a great deal of speculation.
To turn such speculation into extrapolation requires a feel, of the nuances
of the thinking of these Central Bankers.
A review of the "Washington Agreement" s critical agreements is
necessary. These were: -
- Gold will remain an important element of Global Monetary Reserves.
- The gold salesalready decided will be achieved through a concerted
programme of sales over the next five years. Annual Sales will not exceed
approximately 400 tonnes and total sales over this period will not exceed
2,000 tonnes.
- The signatories to this agreement have agreed not to expand their gold
leasings and their use of gold futures and options over this period.
- This agreement will be reviewed after five years.
Our conclusions: -
| I. |
|
The confirmation that the sales we have seen, are seeing
and will see next yearwere arranged by September 1999.
|
| II. |
|
This confirms our understanding that this agreementset annualceilings on
the sales of gold.
|
| III. |
|
This attitude of the Central Banks is absolutely clear from this,
that they were puttinga brake on sales.
|
| IV. |
|
It is the intention of these Central Bankers and we believe, the B.I.S.
and the U.S. Federal Reserve, that gold's role in the Monetary system
is reaffirmed eventually. It follows that this role will become more
apparent and active in times when fiat currencies, in particular the
U.S. $, will be enabled to benefit from this element in the World's reserves,visibly,
when the governments of the countries involved decide!
|
| V. |
|
As 2004 September approaches, discussions behind closed doors must
be about to be, or are taking place, ona renewal of the Washington
Agreement.
|
| VI. |
|
If a renewal does not take place, reliable sources we have feel
thatNO key Central Bank Sales will take place post-September
2004.
|
| VII. |
|
It makes absolutely no sense to place such a ceiling on sales, for
five years, only to abandon such limitation, at the end of that period.
It is clear that such limitations will take place in the future [as
we have discussed in earlier articles in G-AM].No definite arrangements
have been announced for future sales, to date.
|
| VIII. |
|
Bearing in mind the success of the agreement so far, in turning the
gold price around from a falling price to a rising price with considerable
underlying orderliness, any future sales will hope to continue an orderly
rise in the price.This is not the same as a slowly rising price, nor
does it indicate prescribed levels, simply a price which is credible,
whatever level it should go to.
|
| IX. |
|
We have no doubt thatthe 15 signatorieswill keep their obligations under
the Washington Agreement, limiting Central Bank Sales to the remaining
126 tonnes, until September of this year and the 400 tonnes to be sold
next year.Thereafter, they will stick to any renewal of the Central
Bank Gold Agreement.
|
| X. |
|
If gold is to remain"an important element of Monetary reserves",the
E.C.B. intention of keeping it at15% of reserves,can only be
ageneral indication of levels of reserves at the current prices.
To hold this levelwould imply that they have "fixed" the
price of gold, in terms of their currency reserves, mainly the $, which
is most unlikely! We cannot see the two positions as consistent.The
prospect of gold sales taking place whenever a hefty price rise occurred,
would be counter productive and against the spirit of this agreement.
|
| XI. |
|
Indeed for gold to remain an important element of gold reserves andsit
comfortably with governments [not necessarily Central Bankers]it
must be in asupport role to paper currencies.For it to remain
such an important element of monetary reserves successfully, in this
world, it can no longer have a control element in it role, as
it had in the past. It has tosupport and not define, changing
levels of money supply. With the global economy favouring a growing
money supply, this would take the form of a continually rising price.
|
| XII. |
|
A simple reflection of the gold price in local currency terms expressed
of a nation's reserves, at whatever level it sits, would initially
be sufficient for it to provide some support for these currencies. Its
role would be pragmatic and unobtrusive.
|
| XIII. |
|
The next Central Bank Gold Agreement,is likely to set ceilings
to sales of Official gold again, even if none are already arranged
[ or do not take place], or to confirm atermination of Official
gold sales.
|
| XIV. |
|
London Dealersare of the opinion that sales of 500 tonnes
a yearmay be agreed, with the prime purpose of stabilising the
rise in the price of gold. They feel that 500 tonnes would be insufficient
to hold the price down. If this proves to be the case it will be so
only if the C. B. 's intentions are to utilise gold in the Monetary
system, as we described above, in the relatively near future.
|
| XV. |
|
In the unlikely event that no renewal of the Washington Agreement
takes place, indications and our feelings are that no further key Central
Bank sales will take place from Sept 2004 onwards.
|
Market Impact
Official Market
We have the prospect now, of China encouraging the acquisition of gold by
its citizens and itself, through the freeing of internal gold markets and the
steady accumulation of gold in its reserves. Chinese off-take, once it has
gained momentum, may equal annual newly mined gold in total, eventually [as
we explained earlier].
In addition, Russia has taken a similar stance, publicly stating a pro-gold
position and accumulating more gold in its reserves [Simply by adding local
production to reserves].
We see the beginnings of an gold Dinar in Middle Eastern countries.
All in all, a discouraging picture for Central Bankers, intending to sell
gold. The only vocal prospect of gold sales comes from the President
of the German Central Bank, Herr Welteke, feeling out public opinion, on
the prospect of German Gold sales. After previously indicating that small
sales of gold from German reserves were possible, he subsequently said that
the Bundesbank would only sell Germany's gold, provided it was able to invest
the proceeds in income earning assets.
He well knows that it would take the changing of the country's laws to stop
the proceeds from going direct to the German government. In saying this, he,
in our opinion,moved away from the prospect of sizeable German gold reserve
sales.
It is becoming clearer by the day, that there is a diminishing enthusiasm
amongst Central Bankers to sell their gold.
Open Market
- That the demand on rising prices swallowed Portugal's 90 tonnes, so easily,
shows the increased appetite of this market. With newly produced gold supply
on the wane and the absorption of this large quantity, it is crystal clear
that the remaining 123 tonnes, to be supplied from now to September 2003
by the "Official" suppliers, isnot sufficient to satisfy
this market!
- Those who need to buy at these sorts of price levels [Producers who are
aggressively de-hedging] are now on notice to do it quickly, or pay higher
prices. This realisation willprecipitate further demand from the largest
buyers in the market.In the first quarter of this year to date disclosed
de-hedging is at 141 tonnes, but we feel that that figure may be substantially
higher.With most gold producers being of the belief that we are in
a multi year bull market in gold, de-Hedging could equal last years levels,should
the gold price rise to closer to the $400 level again. To wait to above $375,
would ensure losses on these hedges, so with gold at current levels [$340+ ]
de-Hedging should be taking place as fast as the market can accommodate.
- Further "new" supplies canonlycome from Dis-hoarded,
or Scrap gold.A higher price will be required to prompt this supply.
- Once they realise the coming tightening of the market, physical buyers
will also be aware of the supply shortage situation andcould well secure
supplies in excess of requirements ahead of a large price rise?
History, the Present and Future W.A. "Official" Gold supplies
Year 1
1999-00 |
Year 2
2000-01 |
Year 3
2001-02 |
Year 4
to date |
Total
to date |
Sales
to come
Year 4 |
Likely
Year 5
2003-04 |
Likely
Total under
CBGA |
| United Kingdom |
150 |
135 |
60 |
0 |
345 |
0 |
0 |
345 |
| Netherlands |
100 |
27 |
9 |
33 |
169 |
0 |
131 |
300 |
| Austria |
30 |
30 |
30 |
0 |
90 |
0 |
0 |
90 |
| Switzerland |
120 |
200 |
283 |
157 |
760 |
126 |
266 |
1,152 |
| Germany |
0 |
12 |
11 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
| Portugal |
0 |
0 |
0 |
90 |
90 |
0 |
0 |
90 |
| Total |
400 |
404 |
393 |
280 |
1,477 |
126 |
397 |
2000 |
Source: World Gold Council
Conclusions
- We cannot ignore the Washington Agreement and its future successor any
more. It is proving very successful! No doubt many of the Bullion Banks and
Hedgers would have had many disasters had it not been in place. If these
institutions don't take advantage of this "extra" supply to the
market, they will face these disasters, because the "Official" supplies
are dwindling rapidly this year and the 400 tonnes scheduled for next year
arelooking insufficient to hold the price down. If we are right, the
maximum impact of next years supply of 400 tonnes, will, at best,simply
keep the market orderly in its rise, just as the key Central Bankers
want.
- The next Central Bank Gold Agreement, will aimto reinforce the last
one in its purpose, but not necessarily in its application. The next
agreement can accommodate a lower, a higher, or the same level of sales
as the present one, butit remains to be seen whether there will be willing
sellers, in the face of the dubious stability of the $.
- It may even be that this next Agreement accommodates a 'new' method
of valuing Gold in the signatories "Official" Reserves at$
market prices, as a first step to the re-affirmation of gold's support
role in the Monetary system.[More on that later]
|